1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.47.15334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillatory exchange coupling in Co/Cu(111) superlattices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Cr a long period of 18 Α was found whereas for Os, which was not included in earlier experiments, also a significantly larger period of approximately 15 Α was found [16]. Moreover, further experiments [17,18], also inspired by theoretical predictions, showed that the oscillation periods depended on the specific growth orientation, i.e. on the orientation of the crystallographic planes with respect to the film normal, so that, even for a given element, no unique period could be defined.…”
Section: Experimental Observations Hisorymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For Cr a long period of 18 Α was found whereas for Os, which was not included in earlier experiments, also a significantly larger period of approximately 15 Α was found [16]. Moreover, further experiments [17,18], also inspired by theoretical predictions, showed that the oscillation periods depended on the specific growth orientation, i.e. on the orientation of the crystallographic planes with respect to the film normal, so that, even for a given element, no unique period could be defined.…”
Section: Experimental Observations Hisorymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For very weak IEC (typically below 0.003 mJ/m 2 ), the Co3 hysteresis loop is essentially not shifted (loop shift lower than $1 mT) and the total magnetic signal is then the superposition of contributions from a classical uncompensated SynF and from another magnetic thin layer of low coercivity. To obtain an experimental realization of such weak coupling as a reference sample, it is possible to replace the IrMn spacer layer by a Cu layer of 3 nm thickness, known to provide a weak RKKY interlayer coupling for this relatively large thickness [26]. In the opposite limit of strong IEC, the system is equivalent to a single compensated SynF of composition Co5/Ru/Co5 since the coupling through IrMn is strong enough so that the two Co layers within the Co2/IrMn/Co3 sandwich switch together and thus behaves magnetically as a single Co5 thin film.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem concerns the appearance of giant magnetoresistance (GMR) in multilayers that have little [1,2] or no [3] evidence for antiferromagnetic (AF) coupling between Co layers which is up to now a well-established mechanism responsible for GMR in magnetic multilayers through spin dependent scattering. Some authors have put forward sample structural defects as a possible explanation for a lack of antiferromagnetic coupling, for example it was suggested that stacking faults [4] and pinholes [5] may lead to ferromagnetic bridging across neighbouring layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%