2000
DOI: 10.5796/electrochemistry.68.794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillation Phenomena on the Cell Voltage of PEFCs During CO Poisoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurements were performed after cell voltage became stable, and the minimum cell voltages were recorded because of the cell voltage vibration phenomena by CO poisoning. 30 Voltage losses with Pt-Ti alloys for the H 2 fuel containing 100 ppm CO were smaller than those with Pt. Especially, voltage loss with Pt1Ti1͑900͒/C was eight times lower than that with Pt͑200͒/C at the current density of 200 mA cm −2 , i.e., CO tolerance was actually improved by alloying with Ti.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The measurements were performed after cell voltage became stable, and the minimum cell voltages were recorded because of the cell voltage vibration phenomena by CO poisoning. 30 Voltage losses with Pt-Ti alloys for the H 2 fuel containing 100 ppm CO were smaller than those with Pt. Especially, voltage loss with Pt1Ti1͑900͒/C was eight times lower than that with Pt͑200͒/C at the current density of 200 mA cm −2 , i.e., CO tolerance was actually improved by alloying with Ti.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Experimental and theoretical studies have revealed nonlinear responses, such as multiple steady states as well as periodic oscillations. Studied oscillations in PEMFCs can result from either poisoning effects of the catalysts (26) or complex water management. The study of the current oscillations under low cathode hydration has been the focus of several research groups recently, with the aim of understanding the variables that control the phenomenon and its origin (11,(27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%