2021
DOI: 10.1109/jmw.2021.3109244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonal Versus Zero-Forced Beamforming in Multibeam Antenna Systems: Review and Challenges for Future Wireless Networks

Abstract: Orthogonality in multibeam antennas is revisited. The difference between orthogonal beamforming and zero-forced beamforming is highlighted. The intriguing relation between orthogonality, reciprocity and losses is recapitulated. Different approaches on the design of orthogonal beamforming networks and implementation of zero-forced beamforming strategies are shown with various examples from the antenna-research-oriented literature. The use of orthogonal and zero-forced beamforming is discussed from the communica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This solution uses loaded transmission lines to produce a travelling wave operation, like in some leaky-wave antennas. Shortly after, the Butler matrix was proposed [149] which provides a theoretically lossless design [150]. This solution shows the tight link between beamforming theory and signal processing theory, as the concept behind the But-ler matrix is equivalent to the Fast Fourier Transform [151].…”
Section: Passive Beamforming Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This solution uses loaded transmission lines to produce a travelling wave operation, like in some leaky-wave antennas. Shortly after, the Butler matrix was proposed [149] which provides a theoretically lossless design [150]. This solution shows the tight link between beamforming theory and signal processing theory, as the concept behind the But-ler matrix is equivalent to the Fast Fourier Transform [151].…”
Section: Passive Beamforming Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling ratios range from −1.6 dB to 1.6 dB and the phase shifts from −195 • to −140 • . This design has the added benefit of transferring no power to matched loads on transmit, making it lossless on transmit [27], [28].…”
Section: Feed-network Response and Chequered-network Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this is to effectively avoid the occurrence of frequency aliasing. The signal modulation can be described as SRC (0.2, 1), and the 5th to 13th sub-beams are preferred, as they minimize the probability of interference in other systems in the ISM frequency band [42][43][44].…”
Section: Satellite-based Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%