2016
DOI: 10.9761/jasss3219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ortaöğreti̇m Matemati̇k Öğretmeni̇ Adaylarinin İspat Kavramina Ve İspat Yapmanin Z

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was observed that in some cases, the participants could not choose the appropriate one to make inferences from their existing prior knowledge and use it strategically, and sometimes they could not continue due to lack of knowledge. This situation is similar to the results of the studies of Dane (2008), Polat and Akgün (2016), Sarı Uzun and Bülbül (2013), and Weber (2001 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it was observed that in some cases, the participants could not choose the appropriate one to make inferences from their existing prior knowledge and use it strategically, and sometimes they could not continue due to lack of knowledge. This situation is similar to the results of the studies of Dane (2008), Polat and Akgün (2016), Sarı Uzun and Bülbül (2013), and Weber (2001 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…(Knapp, 2005). In the conducted studies, it was revealed that difficulties such as not knowing where to start proving and how to continue (Healy and Hoyles, 2007), not using the existing preliminary information strategically (Weber, 2001), lack of knowledge of definition (Dane, 2008;Polat and Akgün, 2016;Cihan, 2019), inability to use mathematical language and notation (Moore, 1994;Knapp, 2005), inability to determine the appropriate proof method (Baki and Kutluca, 2009), inability to understand the nature of proof (Çontay and Duatepe-Paksu, 2019), lack of mathematical concept readiness and lack of proof image (Pala, Aksoy and Narlı, 2021) occur. It is thought that the teaching methods, techniques, and tools used are effective in understanding the proof conceptually (Weber, 2004), gaining the ability to prove (Harel, Selden, & Selden, 2006) and overcoming difficulties experienced with proof (Hanna and de Villiers, 2008;Skott, Larsen and Østergaard, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ancak bir ders kitabının "Sayılar ve Cebir" öğrenme alanı "Mantık" alt öğrenme alanında ispat kavramının tanımına yer verilirken iki ders kitabında ispatlama kavramının tanımına yer verilmiştir. Literatürdeki bazı çalışmaların sonuçları katılımcıların ispat kavramının tanımını yapmada güçlükler yaşadıklarını ortaya koymaktadır (Çontay & Duatepe-Paksu, 2019;Köğce & Yıldız, 2011;Polat & Akgün, 2016). Ayrıca ispat ve ispatlama birbirlerinden farklı kavramlardır.…”
Section: Tartişma Sonuç Ve öNeri̇lerunclassified
“…As §14 extends the moratorium to only civil proceedings, it has been contended that the ED is not barred from initiating attachments [57]. In Varsanna Ispat v Deputy Director [58] ,the SC upheld the NCLAT order allowing the sale of assets attached by the ED, reasoning that moratorium under §14 would not be attracted as the attachment was before the initiation of the CIRP and Third-party and creditor rights the proceedings before the PMLA are of a criminal nature [59]. The second limb of this reasoning must be re-examined in the light of the recent amendment to the IBC, which introduced §32A [60], the constitutional validity of which was upheld in Manish Kumar v Union of India [61].…”
Section: Special Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%