2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oropharyngeal airway changes after rapid palatal expansion evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
97
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
97
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhao et al, 7 who analyzed the same area with CBCT before and 15 months after RME, found no significant differences in the volume of the oropharynx and nasopharynx. They reported that the hypothesis that there is a change in the upper airways after the procedure is not supported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhao et al, 7 who analyzed the same area with CBCT before and 15 months after RME, found no significant differences in the volume of the oropharynx and nasopharynx. They reported that the hypothesis that there is a change in the upper airways after the procedure is not supported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors claim that there is no evidence to support the hypothesis that no change of volume occurs in the region of the nasal cavity and oropharynx after RME. [7][8][9] Conversely, other authors believe that RME increases the nasal volume and therefore could increase nasal permeability and establish a pattern of nose breathing. 8 Because cone-beam computed tomography is considered a reliable method of assessing the oral cavity and upper airways, we conducted this study to examine possible changes in the upper airway after RME.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While the effect of expansion was not accounted for in the present study, it may not have a significant influence. Several studies have used CBCT scans to evaluate airway changes following palatal expansion, finding no statistically significant effect on OA volume, [30][31][32][33][34] although significant effects have been demonstrated in the nasopharyngeal airway. 35 Lastly, CBCT scans were obtained in the current study with subjects in a seated position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,17,18,[20][21][22] Our examination shows changes of pharyngeal airway dimensions in a study group compared with the control group, at three levels: the biggest increase of the pharyngeal airway dimension in investigated group was seen at the level of vallecula epiglottis (va-pva; 2.97 mm), at the level of uvula (uv-puv; 2.88 mm), and the level of adenoids (PNS-ad1; 2.52 mm), respectively (Table 1). Furthermore, we found improvement of the nasopharyngeal airway capacity at the investigated sample.…”
Section: -22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Still, there are some studies concerning changes in the pharyngeal airway and head posture before and after rapid maxillary treatment. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of RME on the changes in head posture and airway dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%