Ground-based observations of surface incident solar radiation (R s ) have been used to evaluate simulations of global climate models. Existing studies have shown that biases in simulated clouds have a significant spatial pattern, which may be transferred to the simulated R s . Therefore, the evaluation results of R s simulations may depend on the locations of the ground-based observations. In this study, R s simulations of 48 models participating in the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) were first evaluated with ground-based observations from different networks (446 stations in total) from 2000 to 2005. The global mean biases of the CMIP5 R s simulations were found to vary from 4.8 to 11.9 W m À2 when R s observations from different networks were used as reference data. To reduce the location impact on the evaluation results, CMIP5 simulated R s was then evaluated with the latest satellite R s retrieval at 1°× 1°spatial resolution by the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System, Energy Balanced and Filled (CERES EBAF). It was found that the CMIP5 simulated multimodel mean R s has a small bias of 2.