1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0957-4166(00)86275-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origins of the high stereoselectivity in the conjugate addition of lithium(α-methylbenzyl)benzylamide to t-butyl cinnamate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
78
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute configuration at C(3) within (3S,αS)-9 relative to the N-α-methylbenzyl stereocentre is assigned by analogy with previous authenticated models developed to explain the stereoselectivity observed during addition of lithium amide (S)-1 to α,β-unsaturated acceptors [10]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The absolute configuration at C(3) within (3S,αS)-9 relative to the N-α-methylbenzyl stereocentre is assigned by analogy with previous authenticated models developed to explain the stereoselectivity observed during addition of lithium amide (S)-1 to α,β-unsaturated acceptors [10]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The resulting amino ester enolates (i.e., 3 – ) typically aggregate to form homodimers 28 or mixed aggregates with lithium amides (not shown). The high diastereoselectivity is based on the large difference in the steric demand of the 1‐phenylethyl auxiliary in the transition states 25 vs. 26 , which effectively dictates the facial selectivity …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davies showed that the preferred arrangement of conformation and stereofacial attack mode for chiral amides with cyclic and acyclic Michael acceptors corresponds to Figure 3. 21 In the case of a 3,3-dimethylcyclobutene-1-carboxylate substrate, such as 4, interference from the C3 methyl groups could destabilize this mode of attack. In the event, given the low stereochemical excesses observed, it is not possible to assert whether this mode persists at all, nor whether other modes become prevalent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%