Oriented Quiescent Crystallization of Polyethylene Studied by USAXS

Abstract

Summary: Highly oriented high‐pressure injection‐molded (HPIM) rods from polyethylene (PE) were heated until the discrete small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) had vanished. Thereafter, non‐isothermal and isothermal crystallization was investigated in situ by means of ultra small‐angle X‐ray scattering (USAXS). The orientation of the crystallites could be controlled by choice of the melt annealing temperature (shish‐kebab model: memory or self‐nucleation effect caused by stable shishs). Both the scattering patterns and the multidimensional chord distribution function (CDF) were interpreted. A three‐stage model of crystallization was also developed. This model comprises row structure nucleation, the almost statistical insertion of extended lamellae and finally the insertion of blocky crystallites. It was found that the nanostructure evolution in the isotropic fraction of the material was the same as in the highly oriented one. The lateral extension of the lamellae was largest during isothermal crystallization. The correlation among domains was increased by non‐isothermal crystallization. The shishs in the core of the HPIM rod appeared less stable than those in the shell. Lobe‐shaped reflections observed during and after quenching were not due to an orientation distribution of layer stacks, but reflected a correlation between long period and lateral extension of crystallites. During quenching, a lateral modulation of the layer peaks in the CDF grew stronger and showed the arrangement of block‐shaped crystals proposed by Strobl to be the precursors of lamellae. The thin crystals formed during rapid cooling were built from a central block surrounded by one or two rings of satellites. The long period observed in the scattering pattern during quenching is due to correlations among crystalline blocks in a chain, and not from correlations among lamellae.USAXS scattering patterns from isothermal, oriented crystallization of HPIM‐PE material (bottom row: during final quenching after 30 min at 127 °C).magnified imageUSAXS scattering patterns from isothermal, oriented crystallization of HPIM‐PE material (bottom row: during final quenching after 30 min at 127 °C).

Volume‐Resolved Nanostructure Survey of a Polymer Part by Means of SAXS Microtomography

“…Rods (6 mm diameter, 10 cm length) are prepared using the HPIM [2,27] process in order to obtain a material with high preferential orientation. An equilibrated, lowtemperature melt (150…”

“…Highly oriented polyethylene (PE) rods of 6 mm diameter are prepared by high-pressure injection molding (HPIM) [2,27] from commercial material. Anticipating a demonstration study of X-ray micro-CT, one of the rods is warm-drawn in order to both reduce its diameter and to hopefully introduce complex shell structure.…”

Tensile tests of polypropylene monitored by SAXS. Comparing the stretch‐hold technique to the dynamic technique

“…33 Its application has repeatedly been described in detail in many of our earlier articles (cf. [20][21][22][34][35][36][37][38] ). Moreover, it is exemplified in a textbook (Stribeck,39 Sect.…”

Melting and Crystallization of Differently Oriented Sets of Crystallites in Hard-Elastic Polypropylene

“…The same has been found with polyethylene. 14,50 In particular, it looks as if the layer-arrangement mechanism of "random car parking" [51][52][53] is not characterizing crystallization itself but a precedent decomposition of the melt. A possible explanation for the fact that decomposition is not detected in some studies of isotropic PP crystallization may be related to a combination of chemical composition, sample history, quench depth, solid-angle average of the SAXS, background subtraction, and definition of the zero time.…”