2006
DOI: 10.1068/p5268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation Misperceptions Induced by Contrast Polarity: Comment on “Contrast Polarities Determine the Direction of Café Wall Tilts” by Akiyoshi Kitaoka, Baingio Pinna, and Gavin Brelstaff (2004)

Abstract: According to Kitaoka et al (2004, Perception 33 11-20), the Café Wall illusion can be reduced to misalignment effects produced locally by a large shape on a line passing nearby. I demonstrate here that the interacting units are edges and not whole shapes, and that the source of the illusion does not consist in a local tilt but in a tendency of the edges to join when they have the same contrast polarity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, I here propose a new illusion called the reverse checkered illusion (Figure 29), an apparent reversal of the enhanced checkered illusion. This illusion might be able to be attributed to the illusion of shifted edges (see Roncato, 2006).…”
Section: Other Tilt Illusionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, I here propose a new illusion called the reverse checkered illusion (Figure 29), an apparent reversal of the enhanced checkered illusion. This illusion might be able to be attributed to the illusion of shifted edges (see Roncato, 2006).…”
Section: Other Tilt Illusionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One may prefer solving the problem described above by introducing a hypothesis that these tilt illusions are explained with positional illusions (Fermüller & Malm, 2004; Roncato, 2000, 2006; Roncato & Casco, 2003). In the images of these tilt illusions, positional illusions appear in the configuration made up of three fields of different luminances, one being thin and the other two being thick, with the latter flanking the former (Gregory & Heard, 1983; Kitaoka, 2006; Morgan, Mather, Moulden, & Watt, 1984).…”
Section: Other Tilt Illusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lulich and Stevens (1989) demonstrated that if the mortar line is removed and substituted by points of different colours (black points at the centre of the boundary between white tiles, and white points at the centre of the boundary between black tiles) the impression of illusory tilt persists. Kitaoka et al (2001Kitaoka et al ( , 2004 and Roncato (2006) provided further proof that misperception of the orientation of checkerboard lines may be produced by local patterns lacking spatial orientation. (b) The direction of tilt in the Cafe¨Wall illusion cannot be predicted on the basis of local orientation cues.…”
Section: The Cafe¨wall Illusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains unsettling not to understand how an evolutionarily crucial process can be misled by so many visual artefacts (Leviant, 1996). Numerous radially arranged 2D figures constructed from rhythmic, repetitive black-white patterns (luminance gradients) have been repeatedly found to generate illusory motion perception (Gregory, 1995;Kanizsa, 1979;Kitaoka et al, 2001Kitaoka et al, , 2006MacKay, 1958MacKay, , 1980Ouchi, 1977;Pirenne, Compbell, Robson, & MacKay, 1958;Roncato, 2006;Spillmann, 1993;Spillmann, & Dresp, 1995;Thompson, 1880;Wertheimer, 1912;Zoellner, 1860). Most of these illusory motion figures work in 2D space on a sheet of paper, however, fewer motion illusions have been found and observed in 3D space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%