2002
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2002.8663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation and Electronic Structure of Ion-Exchanged Pyridinium Compounds on Mica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These interactions may lead to an ion exchange between potassium atoms and cations of the IL, which in turn may lead to the mentioned island formation. 35 It is of great interest to compare our results with the studies of interfacial behavior of ILs by other research groups. Perkin et al studied the interfacial behavior of ILs confined between two mica surfaces using surface force apparatus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These interactions may lead to an ion exchange between potassium atoms and cations of the IL, which in turn may lead to the mentioned island formation. 35 It is of great interest to compare our results with the studies of interfacial behavior of ILs by other research groups. Perkin et al studied the interfacial behavior of ILs confined between two mica surfaces using surface force apparatus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…One other possibility could be that the IL species initially interact with potassium ions, which are located on top of the cleaved mica. These interactions may lead to an ion exchange between potassium atoms and cations of the IL, which in turn may lead to the mentioned island formation …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33−35 This is attributed to the location of nitrogen atoms in an aromatic ring structure in DNA bases. 36,37 Similar to the nitrogen atom, the binding energy of P 2p for the cantilever modified by Apt1 and Apt2 in Figure 1D was about 133.4 eV, which is the characteristic peak of phosphate in the DNA backbone. 35 However, for the bare cantilever, no characteristic peak of nitrogen or phosphorus was observed.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Figure C shows the high-resolution XPS spectra of N 1s. On cantilevers modified by Apt1 and Apt2, there exhibited two characteristic peaks at about 399.0 and 400.5 eV, which are assigned to conjugated N (sp 2 ) and the mixture of amine group −NH 2 , nonconjugated N (sp 3 ), and N–(C)–N, respectively. This is attributed to the location of nitrogen atoms in an aromatic ring structure in DNA bases. , Similar to the nitrogen atom, the binding energy of P 2p for the cantilever modified by Apt1 and Apt2 in Figure D was about 133.4 eV, which is the characteristic peak of phosphate in the DNA backbone . However, for the bare cantilever, no characteristic peak of nitrogen or phosphorus was observed.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The rather broad signal labeled 1 is due to second-order intensity from oxygen of the mica [20]. The small peak labeled 2 at 285 eV is due to carbon inclusions in the mica substrate [30]. The signal labeled 3 is related to transitions into C-H orbitals of the alkyl chains, feature 4 is indicative of the C-C bond, and 5 is the signal from the potassium 2p [20].…”
Section: Solvent Dependencementioning
confidence: 96%