1999
DOI: 10.1080/10245289908523524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizing the past: A history and its (de)construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Kilduff and Keleman (2004) argue, there are benefits from revisiting classic texts in order to both recover and challenge discourses of theory and practice. Similarly, from Thomas (2003), while text can be seen to be reflective of a specific time and place, insights can be drawn from ‘reflexive commentary’ that surfaces hidden interpretations and voices. We have accordingly, through a poststructuralist rereading of Kanter's (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation , challenged her interpretations based on the liberal feminist perception of gender‐neutral organizational structures.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Kilduff and Keleman (2004) argue, there are benefits from revisiting classic texts in order to both recover and challenge discourses of theory and practice. Similarly, from Thomas (2003), while text can be seen to be reflective of a specific time and place, insights can be drawn from ‘reflexive commentary’ that surfaces hidden interpretations and voices. We have accordingly, through a poststructuralist rereading of Kanter's (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation , challenged her interpretations based on the liberal feminist perception of gender‐neutral organizational structures.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis is influenced by critiques of organizational history that emphasize its``rhetorical'' and``fictional'' nature (De Certeau, 1988;Thomas, 1999;Rowlinson and Hassard, 1993;White, 1980). Proponents of this critique hold that while organizational events do indeed happen, they only become meaningful to participants through mediating discourses (Gioia et al, 2000).…”
Section: The Politics Of Nuclear-organizational History and Heritagementioning
confidence: 99%