2012
DOI: 10.1108/s0163-786x(2012)0000034012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizing Global Nonviolence: The Growth and Spread of Nonviolent INGOS, 1948–2003

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leveraging our new data set on organizational use of nonviolent tactics, we can address this question in ways not possible before. Although research into the diffusion of nonviolent tactics to other countries or other movements has progressed (Chabot ; Gallo‐Cruz ; Gleditsch and Rivera ; Isaac et al. ), the field still lacks a framework for understanding how the tactical choices by one organization affect choices of other organizations.…”
Section: Studies Of Strategies Of Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leveraging our new data set on organizational use of nonviolent tactics, we can address this question in ways not possible before. Although research into the diffusion of nonviolent tactics to other countries or other movements has progressed (Chabot ; Gallo‐Cruz ; Gleditsch and Rivera ; Isaac et al. ), the field still lacks a framework for understanding how the tactical choices by one organization affect choices of other organizations.…”
Section: Studies Of Strategies Of Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This global dimension of repertoire growth works on two levels: (1) as an effect of the global integration of states – as governments become more embedded in international networks; and (2) as an effect of the expansion of global civil society networks, as resisters increasingly mobilize nonviolently to demand change. The global organizational investment in spreading nonviolence has quadrupled since the late 1970s (Gallo-Cruz, 2012), and so too has the incidence of major nonviolent movements grown. Because this ‘third force’ of global civil society (Florini, 2000) is developing its emerging role in world affairs for peace (Dar, 2015) and civil resistance is shifting the authoritative approach to social problems through global–local interfaces (Gallo-Cruz, 2016a), the ways in which global civil society connections shape the choice of nonviolent over violent contention also merits closer scrutiny.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are "brokers" for the flow of norms and resources from more democratic states to less democratic states (Schmitz 2004;Tarrow 2005, 190-194). TSMO members can benefit not only materially but also from specialized training in strategies of resistance (Gallo-Cruz, 2012). Thus, TSMO participation equips and motivates local members to advocate for change in their country.…”
Section: How Transnational Social Movement Organizations Promote Democratic Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%