The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Proceedings of the 10th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1930464.1930484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizing and evaluating course on embedded programming

Abstract: Embedded systems have been an important part of daily human life for a long time. However, in academic education the subject is somewhat new and to some extent undefined. Most courses focus on hardware aspects of embedded systems, and at the same time there is a lack of embedded programming courses. In this paper, we describe our experiences of organizing, designing and evaluating an embedded programming course. We describe course assignments in detail and present pass-rate of each assignment. We also present … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Salminen et al (2011) partitioned the final project of a course on embedded operating systems into several progressive and small sub-projects, such as programming thermometer experiments and small Lego robots. Vanhatupa, Salminen, and J€ arvinen (2010) assigned to students homework that built on exercises carried out in class, such as thermometer programming, Lego robot programming, and acceleration sensor programming. Stollenwerk, Jongdee, and Kowalewski (2009) ;Haetzer, Schley, Khaligh, and Radetzki (2011) asked students to complete a final project, such as a small embedded operating system along with its performance measurement, based on previous experiments or practice.…”
Section: Embedded Operating System Labsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salminen et al (2011) partitioned the final project of a course on embedded operating systems into several progressive and small sub-projects, such as programming thermometer experiments and small Lego robots. Vanhatupa, Salminen, and J€ arvinen (2010) assigned to students homework that built on exercises carried out in class, such as thermometer programming, Lego robot programming, and acceleration sensor programming. Stollenwerk, Jongdee, and Kowalewski (2009) ;Haetzer, Schley, Khaligh, and Radetzki (2011) asked students to complete a final project, such as a small embedded operating system along with its performance measurement, based on previous experiments or practice.…”
Section: Embedded Operating System Labsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The course implementation was described in the previous paper [6]. It is also described in the following as some details have been changed.…”
Section: Course Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guidelines are based on organizing an embedded programming course which was implemented for the second time in spring 2011. The organization and evaluation of the first implementation was discussed in a previous article [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many undergraduate programs include artificial intelligence (AI) or embedded systems in their CS curricula [9,10,11,12]. However, the authors could not find a course that would combine both topics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%