Organizations as Networks of Communication Episodes: Turning the Network Perspective Inside Out

Abstract

Over the last decades, the idea that communication constitutes organizations (CCO) has been gaining considerable momentum in organization studies. The CCO perspective provides new insights into key organizational issues, such as the relation between stability and change, between micro-level and macro-level phenomena, or between emergence and control. However, despite various theoretical advancements, the CCO perspective's range of methodologies is still limited to analyzing local communication episodes, rather than studying organizations as broader networks of communication episodes. In this paper, we present a new methodological approach to the study of the relation between organization and communication, based on network analysis. Following a discussion of existing network approaches, we incorporate the fundamental assumptions of the CCO perspective into a methodology that places communication at the center of network analysis by turning the prevalent network perspective inside out, so that the vertices of the network represent communication episodes and the edges represent individuals. We illustrate our methodology with an empirical case study, in which we examine the structures and dynamics of an actual organization as a network of communication episodes. AbstractOver the last decades, the idea that communication constitutes organizations (CCO) has been gaining considerable momentum in organization studies. The CCO perspective provides new insights into key organizational issues, such as the relation between stability and change, between micro-level and macro-level phenomena, or between emergence and control.However, despite various theoretical advancements, the CCO perspective's range of methodologies is still limited to analyzing local communication episodes, rather than studying organizations as broader networks of communication episodes. In this paper, we present a new methodological approach to the study of the relation between organization and communication, based on network analysis. Following a discussion of existing network approaches, we incorporate the fundamental assumptions of the CCO perspective into a methodology that places communication at the center of network analysis by turning the prevalent network perspective inside out, so that the vertices of the network represent communication episodes and the edges represent individuals. We illustrate our methodology with an empirical case study, in which we examine the structures and dynamics of an actual organization as a network of communication episodes.

Diversity as Polyphony: Reconceptualizing Diversity Management from a Communication-Centered Perspective

“…Organizations are thus imagined here as precarious social entities (Nicotera, 2013) that necessitate to become continuously (re)incarnated in and through the occurrence of interconnected communicative practices (Blaschke et al, 2012;Nicotera, 2013).…”

Dominant Cognitive Frames and The Innovative Power Of Social Networks

“…We analyse the characterization of a network's cognitive frame (ties between actors and their cognitions), alongside a more traditional SNA (ties between actors), and supplement this with qualitative data to study the structure and content of social networks. Our mixed-method approach differs from studies seeking to map discrete stages of (Blaschke, Schoeneborn, & Seidl, 2012). Moreover, our focus on a network's cognitive frame can also be distinguished from the study of 'cognitive social structures' based on individuals' perceptions of who is connected to whom (Balkundi & Kilduff, 2006;Krackhardt, 1987).…”

Alliance strategy: context, process, and requirements

“…Process-centric research at the network level often focuses on interactions (Blaschke et al, 2012), and the pivotal role of agency (Gulati and Srivastava, 2014) and time (Halinen et al, 2012). Networks are discursive constructions in which participants construct meaning (Lowe et al, 2016), 'network pictures' and network strategies (Abrahamsen et al, 2016;Vaara et al, 2004).…”

“…Since a network can proceed through the steps multiple times, data can be coded by cycle and step. Cycles could be distinguished based on major episodes (Blaschke et al, 2012).…”

“…A narrative network focuses on the interrelation of narrative elements, combining ideas on (inter)action patterns and associated processes of meaning and value (Donnellon et al, 1986). Narratives entangle and order thoughts, communications, data, events, actions and material elements (Blaschke et al, 2012;Doolin, 2003;Montfort, 2007). People can '… order(s) … relevant issues through telling and relating the details into context'.…”