2018
DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2018.1475223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational self-assessment based on common assessment framework to improve the organizational quality in public administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He has argued that "the characteristics of Weberian bureaucracy, including rational/legal constraints and autonomous professional norms, serve to insulate bureaucrats from effi ciency-undermining political pressures" (Miller, 2000, p. 289). However, chronic problems of unproductive public administration cannot be solved merely by traditional bureaucratic structure and processes alone (Kalfa & Yetim, 2018) or the whole of government approach which beclouds the role of each group. Eff orts to improve performance management in the public sector have seen the adoption of some private sector managerial tools, as in the New Public Management (NPM), Total Quality Management (TQM) and Performance Management (PM) approaches that provide more measurable, practical strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He has argued that "the characteristics of Weberian bureaucracy, including rational/legal constraints and autonomous professional norms, serve to insulate bureaucrats from effi ciency-undermining political pressures" (Miller, 2000, p. 289). However, chronic problems of unproductive public administration cannot be solved merely by traditional bureaucratic structure and processes alone (Kalfa & Yetim, 2018) or the whole of government approach which beclouds the role of each group. Eff orts to improve performance management in the public sector have seen the adoption of some private sector managerial tools, as in the New Public Management (NPM), Total Quality Management (TQM) and Performance Management (PM) approaches that provide more measurable, practical strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, 29 sub-criteria define the key concerns to examine while evaluating an organization. (Kalfa & yetim, 2013 in Kalfa & yetim, 2018). each of the nine criteria (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%