2011
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge

Abstract: O rganizational learning has been an important topic for the journal Organization Science and for the field. We provide a theoretical framework for analyzing organizational learning. According to the framework, organizational experience interacts with the context to create knowledge. The context is conceived as having both a latent component and an active component through which learning occurs. We also discuss current and emerging research themes related to components of our framework. Promising future resear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
1,017
1
37

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,262 publications
(1,098 citation statements)
references
References 228 publications
23
1,017
1
37
Order By: Relevance
“…In that case, surgeons, administrators, and patients should be aware of our findings. While increasing case volume is related to improved performance, not all experience has an equal effect on performance, and some experience may even prove detrimental (Lapré and Nembhard 2010;Ramdas et al 2010;Argote and Miron-Spektor 2011;Lapré 2011). Therefore, it is necessary to understand the composition of an individual's experience along the dimensions we examine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In that case, surgeons, administrators, and patients should be aware of our findings. While increasing case volume is related to improved performance, not all experience has an equal effect on performance, and some experience may even prove detrimental (Lapré and Nembhard 2010;Ramdas et al 2010;Argote and Miron-Spektor 2011;Lapré 2011). Therefore, it is necessary to understand the composition of an individual's experience along the dimensions we examine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we examine an important driver of outcome variation -physician cumulative volume (Sosa et al 1998;Birkmeyer et al 2003;Hammond et al 2003;Waldman, Yourstone and Smith 2003;Vickers et al 2007;Ramdas et al 2010). With increasing surgeon volume, patient outcomes improve; however not all units of experience equally impact performance improvement (Mishina 1999;Lapré and Nembhard 2010;Argote and Miron-Spektor 2011). How then should surgeons accumulate volume in order to improve surgical outcomes?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expected positive effects of participation are often unrealistic (see, for example, the literature reviews by Dachler and Wilpert, 1978;Locke and Schweiger, 1979;Cotton et al, 1988;Woodman, 1989;Glew et al, 1995). In particular, how forms of information (such as accounting and fine-grained information) can contribute to the implementation of a new vision has also largely remained unanswered (Argote and Miron-Spektor 2011, p. 1129-1130. Analyzing the unexpected differences between the dealerships in their participation in the implementation of the change and in the exchange of information provided an opportunity to refine existing academic theory about how different forms of participation can contribute to the exchange of the (accounting and more fine-grained) information that people need to learn how they can contribute to the realization of a new vision.…”
Section: The Analysis Of Unforeseen Effects Of Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is unclear which specific forms of participation are most effective and the expected outcome of participation does often not occur, it is known that participation of lower level managers and workers is necessary to implement a new senior management vision (see, e.g. Lines, 2004;Argote and Miron-Spektor, 2011;Russ, 2008;Armenakis et al, 1993;Dachler and Wilpert, 1978;Locke and Schweiger, 1979;Cotton et al, 1988;Woodman, 1989;Glew et al, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pluralidade de abordagens engloba a psicológica, a sociológica, a cultural, a histórica, a metodológica e a gestão propriamente dita (ANTONELO; GODOY, 2010). No entanto, a essência das definições converge quanto ao aprendizado organizacional como uma mudança no conhecimento da organização, que ocorre à medida que esta adquire experiência (ARGOTE; MIRON-SPEKTOR, 2011). Estes últimos autores destacam que, embora necessária à aprendizagem grupal e organizacional, a aprendizagem individual não é suficiente; o conhecimento adquirido pelo indivíduo deve ser incorporado a um repositório supraindividual para que outros possam acessá-lo.…”
Section: Aprendizagem Organizacionalunclassified