1998
DOI: 10.1177/1350507698293001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Learning: Diverging Communities of Practice?

Abstract: This article provides an overview of current debates in the field of organizational learning through the device of examining key `divergencies' within the literature. Clear divergencies are noted in two areas: first, between the practitioner literature which is primarily engaged in creating learning organizations and the academic literature which is engaged in the study of learning processes in organizations; and, second, in the views of both academics and practitioners about the nature and essence of organiza… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
140
0
14

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
140
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…There are now several reviews of the literature of organizational learning (see Argyris and Schon 1996;Crossan and Guatto 1996;Miller 1996;Vince 1996;Huber 1991;Dodgson 1993;Easterby-Smith 1997;Easterby-Smith et al 1998) and an increasing number of papers on the subject (Crossan and Guatto 1996), representing the continuing interest in this concept from both academics and practitioners. EasterbySmith (1997) argues that there is as yet no consistent theory of organizational learning, but rather a range of 'disciplines' covering different academic areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are now several reviews of the literature of organizational learning (see Argyris and Schon 1996;Crossan and Guatto 1996;Miller 1996;Vince 1996;Huber 1991;Dodgson 1993;Easterby-Smith 1997;Easterby-Smith et al 1998) and an increasing number of papers on the subject (Crossan and Guatto 1996), representing the continuing interest in this concept from both academics and practitioners. EasterbySmith (1997) argues that there is as yet no consistent theory of organizational learning, but rather a range of 'disciplines' covering different academic areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nessa vertente, a compreensão da aprendizagem migra de uma ênfase meramente cognitiva para uma perspectiva sócio-laboral. Em outras palavras, para tal abordagem, a aprendizagem se dá não somente na mente das pessoas, mas, fundamentalmente, nas relações sociais entre os indivíduos engajados numa prá-tica por meio da qual intercambiam experiências, conhecimentos e significados (EASTERBY-SMITH, SNELL e GHERARDI, 1998;GHERARDI, 1999;EASTERBY-SMITH, CROSSAN e NICOLINI, 2000). Assim, privilegia-se a transmissão integral do conhecimento em sua dupla natureza: explícita e tácita.…”
Section: Jader C Souza-silva and Paula Chies Schommerunclassified
“…There is an epistemological divergence in the literature between positivists emphasizing measurement and constructionists stressing the uniqueness of meaning systems (Easterby-Smith et al, 1998). The constructionists emphasize the role of community-of-practice, and they advocate that work practice and learning need to be understood in terms of the communities that emerge (Brown and Duguid, 1991).…”
Section: Community-of-practice and Knowingmentioning
confidence: 99%