Proceedings of the Sriwijaya International Conference on Information Technology and Its Applications (SICONIAN 2019) 2020
DOI: 10.2991/aisr.k.200424.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Knowledge Representation Using Flowcharts with POS Tagger Techniques for Bahasa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anyway, despite their differences and strong/weak characteristics and since there was no standardization for modeling business processes and workflows in many enterprises so far, all the aforementioned process modeling standards are able to describe the business processes and workflows and for that reason all the four standards have been applied to the documentation of the various enterprises' departments in different extents. In the light of the digital transformation of enterprises and the required notation alignment and equivalence rules among the four process modeling standards, the proposed straightforward and simplified business educational equivalence table is based on the already established knowledge in the field of conversions among the four process modeling standards (say, between BPMN diagrams and classic flowcharts (Kelemen et al, 2013;Sarab et al, 2020;Cahyani et al, 2020), between BPMN diagrams and Gantt Charts (Flores & Sepúlveda, 2010), between BPMN diagrams and Petri Nets (El Hichami et al, 2014;Awad, 2013;Dijkman et al, 2008), between classic flowcharts and Petri Nets (Draheim, 2010), and between Gantt Charts and Petri Nets (Wu et al, 2019)). The methodology and the results of this paper can be generalized in any enterprise that may support a variety of the aforementioned process modeling standards across its different departments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyway, despite their differences and strong/weak characteristics and since there was no standardization for modeling business processes and workflows in many enterprises so far, all the aforementioned process modeling standards are able to describe the business processes and workflows and for that reason all the four standards have been applied to the documentation of the various enterprises' departments in different extents. In the light of the digital transformation of enterprises and the required notation alignment and equivalence rules among the four process modeling standards, the proposed straightforward and simplified business educational equivalence table is based on the already established knowledge in the field of conversions among the four process modeling standards (say, between BPMN diagrams and classic flowcharts (Kelemen et al, 2013;Sarab et al, 2020;Cahyani et al, 2020), between BPMN diagrams and Gantt Charts (Flores & Sepúlveda, 2010), between BPMN diagrams and Petri Nets (El Hichami et al, 2014;Awad, 2013;Dijkman et al, 2008), between classic flowcharts and Petri Nets (Draheim, 2010), and between Gantt Charts and Petri Nets (Wu et al, 2019)). The methodology and the results of this paper can be generalized in any enterprise that may support a variety of the aforementioned process modeling standards across its different departments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%