2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-009-0485-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational justice, psychological distress, and work engagement in Japanese workers

Abstract: The effects of organizational justice on psychological distress seem to be mediated by reward at work (or ERI) while those regarding work engagement may be mediated by worksite support to a large extent, at least in Japanese workers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
68
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
8
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with a systematic review of prospective studies in Europe 8) , which reported that low procedural justice and low interactional justice were associated with doctordiagnosed psychiatric disorders and major depressive disorders 9−11) as well as psychiatric morbidity 12−14) , and are also consistent with cross-sectional studies in Japan, which reported negative association of procedural justice and interactional justice with psychological distress 15,16) . Although it was a cross-sectional study, the present study replicates and supports the evidence of association of low organizational justice with major depressive disorders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are consistent with a systematic review of prospective studies in Europe 8) , which reported that low procedural justice and low interactional justice were associated with doctordiagnosed psychiatric disorders and major depressive disorders 9−11) as well as psychiatric morbidity 12−14) , and are also consistent with cross-sectional studies in Japan, which reported negative association of procedural justice and interactional justice with psychological distress 15,16) . Although it was a cross-sectional study, the present study replicates and supports the evidence of association of low organizational justice with major depressive disorders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…After adjusting for other job stressors and demographic characteristics, only the Organizational Justice and Major Depressive Episodes in Japanese Employees: A Cross-sectional Study ric morbidity 12−14) . Some previous studies in Japan reported cross-sectional association of organizational justice with self-reported psychological distress (i.e., depression and anxiety) 15,16) . However, no study has investigated the association of organizational justice with major depressive disorders in Japan.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, based on the perspective of social exchange theory and the findings of previous studies regarding the mediating role of knowledge sharing in the association between organizational procedural justice and innovative work behavior, employee perceptions of organizational procedural justice are positively related to knowledge sharing [3,30,37]. We propose that this positive relationship can further influence the development of employee innovative work behavior.…”
Section: The Mediating Effects Of Work Engagement and Knowledge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…More particularly, the current literature shows that organizational procedural justice has a strong and positive impact on employee work engagement both directly and indirectly [22,27,34,37]. As stated earlier, based on the perspective of the social exchange theory, the feeling of being fairly treated by an organization can make employees more engaged in their work because fair organizational procedures enhance the level of trust and confidence they have in the organization, which in turn sees them reciprocate by displaying positive attitudes and behaviors in their work [22,34].…”
Section: The Effects Of Organizational Procedural Justicementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Konsep Karasek ini dikenal sebagai the job demands-control (JD-C) model atau deman-control-support (DCS) model (Kawakami, 2010a;Inoue, 2010). Model lainnya masing-masing adalah NIOSH job stress model (Hurrel & McLaney, 1988), Effort-reward imballance (ERI) model (Siegrist, 1996), dan sebuah konsep yang dikenal sebagai Organizational Justice Concept (Inoue, 2010), konsep ini melengkapi JD-C model dan ERI model. Dalam NIOSH model, teori tentang stres kerja mengacu pada konsep yang secara skematis dapat dilihat dalam pada Gambar 1.…”
Section: Perkembangan Teori-teori Tentang Stres Kerjaunclassified