2006
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.5.545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Justice, Motivation to Learn, and Training Outcomes

Abstract: This study attempted to examine the impacts of trainees' perceived organizational fairness on their motivation to learn, reactions, and learning. Results with 370 subjects indicated that interactional justice mediates the relationships between distributive/procedural justice and motivation to learn. Subsequently, trainees' motivation to learn influences trainees' reactions and learning. Implications for future research and organizations are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding was consistent with those of previous studies (Alliger & Janak, 1989;Chuang et al, 2005;Clement, 1982;Liao & Tai, 2006). Thus, it suggested that, for example, when organizations require employees to participate in training programs more effectively, they should enhance learning motivation among trainees to increase their learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding was consistent with those of previous studies (Alliger & Janak, 1989;Chuang et al, 2005;Clement, 1982;Liao & Tai, 2006). Thus, it suggested that, for example, when organizations require employees to participate in training programs more effectively, they should enhance learning motivation among trainees to increase their learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Learning motivation consisted of six items adopted from previous studies (e.g., Bell & Ford, 2007;Liao & Tai, 2006;Lima, Leeb & Nam, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies ISSN 2164-4063 2014 also named "training motivation" as "motivation to learn" Holton, Bates, & Ruona, 2000 ;Kontoghiorghes, 2002 ;Mathieu & Martineau, 1997 ;Tracey et al , 2001) which were proved into same variable in different studies Klein, Noe, & Wang, 2006 ;Liao & Tai, 2006 ;Scaduto, Lindsay, & Chiaburu, 2008;Tai, 2006) which cited both same scales developed by Noe and Schmitt (1986) and Noe and Wilk (1993). Meanwhile, present study rather to call it as unilingual "motivation to learn" attributes trainee's desire to learn the content of a training program (Noe, 1986).…”
Section: Motivation To Learn and Motivation To Transfermentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Training motivation refers to the intensity and persistence of the efforts that trainees apply to learning-oriented improvement activities before, during, and after training (Tannenbaum & Yukl, 1992). Liao and Tai (2006) suggested that motivation can be classified in terms of its energizing, directing, and maintaining effects. Training motivation could serve as a force that energizes individuals' commitment to training and directs not only their learning but also their attempts to master training materials and apply their acquired knowledge and skills.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Training Transfer and Training Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%