Abstract:Purpose
Encouraging employees to exhibit innovative behaviour at the workplace is the need of the hour. Prior studies reported the impact of organisational justice on innovative behaviour; however, the majority of these studies are from the Western context. Moreover, the underlying mechanism linking these variables, namely, the role of knowledge sharing, is sparse. The purpose of this paper is to examine the mediating role of knowledge sharing in the relationship between organisational justice and innovative b… Show more
“…Workplace dignity is mainly manifested in respectful interactions, recognition of one’s competence and contributions, feelings of being valued and equality at work (Thomas and Lucas, 2019; Tiwari and Sharma, 2019). Findings of current research corroborate the earlier empirical evidence which suggests that perception of fairness, equality and well-being and feelings of respect and being valued at work augment employees’ tendency to move beyond transactional obligations and exhibit extra-role and self-sacrificial behaviours (Eva et al , 2020; Jnaneswar and Ranjit, 2020) such as knowledge sharing (Jia et al , 2019; Gupta et al , 2021). In this way, the present investigation contributes to SET (Blau, 1964) by validating its core proposition which suggests that positive treatments perceived by employees at workplace prompt them to reciprocate with desirable behaviours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Prior research suggests that such work characteristics are the reflection of positive treatment from colleagues and organization in terms of respect, care and trust (Luo, 2007). These positive treatments augment employees' perception of self-esteem and meaningful existence and thus stimulate positive social exchange process (Jnaneswar and Ranjit, 2020;Dayan et al, 2009) whereby employees are inclined to reciprocate with selfsacrificial, voluntary and extra-role behaviours (Bartel et al, 2012). Consistent with this reasoning, prior empirical evidence indicates that respect, care, well-being and fairness exhibited by work environment nurture positive social exchange process that make employees feel obligated to reciprocate such supportive treatments with discretionary and extra-role behaviours such as organizational citizenship behaviour (Eva et al, 2020), innovative behaviour (Jnaneswar and Ranjit, 2020) and knowledge sharing (Jia et al, 2019), particularly TKS (Gupta et al, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
Purpose
Drawing on social exchange theory (SET) and proactive motivation model, this study aims to examine the relationship between workplace dignity and employees’ tacit knowledge sharing (TKS) and assess the mediating role of psychological safety and organizational identification in this relationship.
Design/methodology/approach
Data are collected in the three waves from 307 first-line supervisors and professionals of high- and medium-high-tech manufacturing organizations of Pakistan. Partial least squares structural equation modelling technique is applied using SmartPLS 4 software to test hypothesized relationships.
Findings
Results reveal that workplace dignity is directly and positively related to TKS and psychological safety and organizational identification mediate this relationship.
Practical implications
This study highlights the importance of workplace dignity as a vital determinant of TKS. Findings of this research underscore the need for enactment of humanistic and employee-oriented organizational policies and practices that signal workplace dignity which can result in increased psychological safety and enhanced organizational identification leading towards higher TKS.
Originality/value
This research proffers novel understanding of the nexus between an embryonic socio-emotional element of workplace context, namely, workplace dignity and TKS. This study not only advances knowledge management literature from dignity perspective but also contributes to SET and proactive motivation model.
“…Workplace dignity is mainly manifested in respectful interactions, recognition of one’s competence and contributions, feelings of being valued and equality at work (Thomas and Lucas, 2019; Tiwari and Sharma, 2019). Findings of current research corroborate the earlier empirical evidence which suggests that perception of fairness, equality and well-being and feelings of respect and being valued at work augment employees’ tendency to move beyond transactional obligations and exhibit extra-role and self-sacrificial behaviours (Eva et al , 2020; Jnaneswar and Ranjit, 2020) such as knowledge sharing (Jia et al , 2019; Gupta et al , 2021). In this way, the present investigation contributes to SET (Blau, 1964) by validating its core proposition which suggests that positive treatments perceived by employees at workplace prompt them to reciprocate with desirable behaviours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Prior research suggests that such work characteristics are the reflection of positive treatment from colleagues and organization in terms of respect, care and trust (Luo, 2007). These positive treatments augment employees' perception of self-esteem and meaningful existence and thus stimulate positive social exchange process (Jnaneswar and Ranjit, 2020;Dayan et al, 2009) whereby employees are inclined to reciprocate with selfsacrificial, voluntary and extra-role behaviours (Bartel et al, 2012). Consistent with this reasoning, prior empirical evidence indicates that respect, care, well-being and fairness exhibited by work environment nurture positive social exchange process that make employees feel obligated to reciprocate such supportive treatments with discretionary and extra-role behaviours such as organizational citizenship behaviour (Eva et al, 2020), innovative behaviour (Jnaneswar and Ranjit, 2020) and knowledge sharing (Jia et al, 2019), particularly TKS (Gupta et al, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
Purpose
Drawing on social exchange theory (SET) and proactive motivation model, this study aims to examine the relationship between workplace dignity and employees’ tacit knowledge sharing (TKS) and assess the mediating role of psychological safety and organizational identification in this relationship.
Design/methodology/approach
Data are collected in the three waves from 307 first-line supervisors and professionals of high- and medium-high-tech manufacturing organizations of Pakistan. Partial least squares structural equation modelling technique is applied using SmartPLS 4 software to test hypothesized relationships.
Findings
Results reveal that workplace dignity is directly and positively related to TKS and psychological safety and organizational identification mediate this relationship.
Practical implications
This study highlights the importance of workplace dignity as a vital determinant of TKS. Findings of this research underscore the need for enactment of humanistic and employee-oriented organizational policies and practices that signal workplace dignity which can result in increased psychological safety and enhanced organizational identification leading towards higher TKS.
Originality/value
This research proffers novel understanding of the nexus between an embryonic socio-emotional element of workplace context, namely, workplace dignity and TKS. This study not only advances knowledge management literature from dignity perspective but also contributes to SET and proactive motivation model.
“…In other words, if employees perceive that they are treated fairly, in terms of outcomes, procedures, interactional communications about resources and decision-making, they are expected to be more encouraged to depict knowledge sharing. Furthermore, fairness in the organization boosts confidence and trust among employees, and employees reciprocate by demonstrating desirable behavior such as knowledge sharing (Khaola and Coldwell, 2019; Janeswar and Ranjit, 2020; Ye et al ., 2023). Knowledge sharing is key to success for employees at each and every state of innovative work behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although organizational justice has various definitions, organizational justice is considered as the extent of employees' perception of equality and fairness in the organizations they are working for (Pan et al, 2018;Greenberg, 1990). There are a large number of researches implies that organizational justice is crucial because it has significant effects on the employees' attitudes: job satisfaction (Hao et al, 2016), employee commitment (Aggarwal et al, 2022), turnover intention (Suifan et al, 2017;Kang and Sung, 2019) or employees' innovative behaviors (Janeswar and Ranjit, 2020;Khaola and Coldwell, 2019), that eventually result in work performance, work outcome (Sembiring et al, 2020;De Clercq and Pereira, 2020;Arab and Atan, 2018).…”
Section: Organizational Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In today's turbulent business environment, innovation attracts more attention from academia and industry because it enables one to create and attain competitive advantages (Janeswar and Ranjit, 2020; Jada et al ., 2019). Innovation occurs through creating and implementing ideas at all levels in the organization.…”
PurposeEncouraging employees to display innovative behavior at the workplace is the need of all enterprises in this competitive era of the modern business environment. The study aims to explore the mediating role of knowledge sharing in the relationship between organizational justice and innovative behavior among employees working in the information technology (IT) industry in Vietnam.Design/methodology/approachThe research model was tested on the data collected from 387 employees working in IT enterprises with AMOS 22 software.FindingsConfirmatory factor analysis implied a good model fit. The results show that knowledge sharing mediates the effects of organizational justice with three main forms distributive, procedural and interactional justice on innovative behavior.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study provide valuable evidence and implications for the executive of IT enterprise in boosting knowledge sharing, and innovative behaviors among the employees, in improving their perception of justice in the workplace. This is particularly important due to the significant role of knowledge sharing in organizational development.Originality/valueThis study pioneered the identification of the underlying mechanism of organization justice – innovative behavior nexus by highlighting knowledge sharing as a mediator. Moreover, this study takes a step beyond by suggesting a more complicated model that explored mediating two dimensions of knowledge sharing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.