2008
DOI: 10.7202/018342ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organisation communautaire et abandon scolaire : illustration d’un champ d’intervention

Abstract: L’abandon scolaire est aujourd’hui au centre des préoccupations d’une diversité d’acteurs québécois. C’est pour enrichir les connaissances en organisation communautaire que cet article propose d’illustrer les dimensions incontournables d’un champ d’intervention qui a pour préoccupations centrales l’abandon et la persévérance scolaires. Parmi les sujets traités, il sera question du contexte historique de la prévention de l’abandon scolaire, de la pertinence de l’organisation communautaire pour faire face à ce p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, no control group was used in this study (that is, one group having undergone a communitybased intervention and the other not) in order to evaluate the real impact of the BO2 program and provide a comparison over time (before and after) (Duncan & Magnuson, 2003). Also, it was impracticable to take into account the characteristics of the young people (e.g., mental health problems) and their surroundings although it is recognized that students' networks (family, friends, and others), the mobilization of school teams, and a positive relationship between young people and the institutional system contribute significantly to preventing school drop-out (Beaumont, Bourdon, Couture, & Fortin, 2009;Vultur, 2009;Cook, 2008;Marcotte, Royer, Fortin, Potvin, & Leclerc, 2001;Rousseau, Tétreault, Bergeron, & Carignan, 2007;Molgat, 2007;Bourdon & Vultur, 2007). Another limitation concerns the impossibility of generalizing the results due to the small number of cases studied.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, no control group was used in this study (that is, one group having undergone a communitybased intervention and the other not) in order to evaluate the real impact of the BO2 program and provide a comparison over time (before and after) (Duncan & Magnuson, 2003). Also, it was impracticable to take into account the characteristics of the young people (e.g., mental health problems) and their surroundings although it is recognized that students' networks (family, friends, and others), the mobilization of school teams, and a positive relationship between young people and the institutional system contribute significantly to preventing school drop-out (Beaumont, Bourdon, Couture, & Fortin, 2009;Vultur, 2009;Cook, 2008;Marcotte, Royer, Fortin, Potvin, & Leclerc, 2001;Rousseau, Tétreault, Bergeron, & Carignan, 2007;Molgat, 2007;Bourdon & Vultur, 2007). Another limitation concerns the impossibility of generalizing the results due to the small number of cases studied.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of community intervention to prevent school drop-out 1 (Cook, 2008;Mercier, 2000) and its influence on social relations and academic perseverance (Roy, 2003;Bourdon, Charbonneau, Lapostelle, and Létoumeau, 2007) has already been shown. The same can be said for the contributions made by Quebec's centres communautaires de loisir (CCL) (community recreation centres) to the prevention of social problems, the networking capabilities of people and families, and community development (Fréchette, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%