2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-020-02736-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organic residue and agricultural lime interactions on CO2 emissions from two contrasting soils: implications for carbon management in acid soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was clearly observed across different studies with varying magnitudes, which employ different plant residues (Figure 1A). However, certain discrepant reports were also noted in our meta‐analysis, which deviates from the central notion of increased soil pH (Bramble et al., 2021; Clark et al., 2007; Lauricella et al., 2021; Marx et al., 2002; Tang & Yu, 1999; J. M. Xu et al., 2006; R. K. Xu & Coventry, 2003; Yan et al., 1996; Yuan, Xu, Wang, & Li, 2011). These studies report negative or zero effects in pH shifts.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was clearly observed across different studies with varying magnitudes, which employ different plant residues (Figure 1A). However, certain discrepant reports were also noted in our meta‐analysis, which deviates from the central notion of increased soil pH (Bramble et al., 2021; Clark et al., 2007; Lauricella et al., 2021; Marx et al., 2002; Tang & Yu, 1999; J. M. Xu et al., 2006; R. K. Xu & Coventry, 2003; Yan et al., 1996; Yuan, Xu, Wang, & Li, 2011). These studies report negative or zero effects in pH shifts.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Bramble et al, 2021;Clark et al, 2007;Lauricella et al, 2021; MarxF I G U R E 2 Relative percentage change of acid soil pH as affected by plant residue attributes. These attributes have been categorized into group (legume and non-legume) (A), total alkalinity (B), total N (C), C:N (D), total C (E), mesh size (F), and temperature (G).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the increase in C mineralisation should have increased the SOC_CO 2 emissions following the application of aglime (e.g., Dumale et al, 2011). However, the magnitude and dynamics of the C priming effect largely depend on the quality and initial content of C and the resulting nutrient supply to decomposing organisms (Bramble et al, 2021) together with pH dynamics. The potential decrease in SOC mineralisation following aglime application in this study related to lower CO 2 emissions could also be due to: (i) increased microbial C‐use efficiency, as soil microbial communities use less energy maintaining intracellular pH or there is a change in community composition (Pal et al, 2007), (ii) a more pronounced SOC stabilizing effect and calcium (Ca 2+ ) in the soil structure (Muneer & Oades, 1989; Wachendorf, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong evidence of humic-like substances generated from partial oxidation of lignocellulosic biomass was probably due to the condensation of intermediate compounds derived from the WAO process since the thermal degradation, hydrolysis, and oxidation of lignocellulosic material fragments into smaller-molecular-weight compounds lead to a complex reaction mechanism in this closed system, such as aromatization, polymerization, and deposition onto mineral content, thus avoiding organic degradation , (Scheme ). In this context, Bramble et al observed the reduction of OM mineralization (i.e., organic carbon) by application of limestone with organic byproducts, another important step to better understand the mechanism that regulates SOM mineralization by mineral phase interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%