“…Some stromatoporoids, like many labechiids, do not show to grow, while the laminar growth units appear to have been disrupted at least twice by sediment incursions, ×2.5 (Webby, Zhen, & Percival, 1997, pl. 2C); 2, longitudinal section illustrating that initial cystose growth of specimen developed over a relatively flat laminar base, then columnar growth took over as successive, large axial cyst plates were added to the column, ×2.5 (Webby, new); 3, longitudinal section of skeleton also formed on a relatively flat laminar base, and again lower-lying laminar units appear to have been disrupted a number of times by sediment influxes, while broadly raised columnar area to left maintained a continuity of growth, ×2.5 (Webby, new); 4, tangential section showing columnar nature of vertical growth, ×2.4 (Webby, new); 5, longitudinal view illustrating remarkable continuity of a vertical column relative to lateral growth; note pattern of lateral extensions initially draping off main column, perhaps because sediment was already piled up against rapidly upgrowing column, ×0.75 (Webby, new); 6, longitudinal section, Pachystylostroma surculum WeBBy, holotype, PMO 97112, Mjøsa Limestone, Bergevika, Norway, showing strongly mamelate nature of large domical skeleton, especially close to its upper surfaces, where many sediment-filled inclusions seem to occur; with respect to near-surface growth of such skeletons, they may be described also as locally digitolaminar, ×3.5 (Webby, 1979, fig. 2C).…”