2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40300-022-00229-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordinal response variation of the polytomous Rasch model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To conclude, we have presented both a methodology [25] to overcome current practice shortcomings in analyzing word learning list tests, i.e., using the Rasch model [17] and CSE [4], [5], as well as additional evidence for how repeated trials can lead to learning effects. This can be clinically used not only to measure a person's memory but also his or her learning ability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To conclude, we have presented both a methodology [25] to overcome current practice shortcomings in analyzing word learning list tests, i.e., using the Rasch model [17] and CSE [4], [5], as well as additional evidence for how repeated trials can lead to learning effects. This can be clinically used not only to measure a person's memory but also his or her learning ability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Moradi et al [4] define learning in RAVLT as the score of trial 5 minus the score of trial 1. Raw scores equal 1 for pass or 0 for fail, i.e., an ordinal scale [17], [18]. However, because of ordinality, such classifications have no numerical meaning and only serve to clearly indicate the ordered categories [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the memory Rey’s Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), where raw scores equal 1 for pass or 0 for fail, Moradi et al ([ 47 ], p. 417) defined learning as the score of trial 5 minus the score of trial 1. However, raw scores have no numerical meaning and only serve to indicate the ordered categories ([ 48 ], p. 2). In turn, such an improper analysis will only lead to unnecessarily large uncertainties (expressed in terms of entropy according to (ii) above) and to associated increased risks of incorrect decisions.…”
Section: Appendix A1 Analysing Categorical Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passes or fails in responses to memory tests are just observations, lying at best on an ordinal response scale, and simply counting the number of passes cannot be regarded as measurement, since the latter must be at least on an interval scale [7,27,28]. Ordinal observations (such as responses to memory tests) are subject to possible scale non-linearity, which, unless evaluated and corrected for, will lead to uncertainties and decision risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%