2012
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2012/10/p10027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordering dynamics of the multi-state voter model

Abstract: Abstract. The voter model is a paradigm of ordering dynamics. At each time step, a random node is selected and copies the state of one of its neighbors. Traditionally, this state has been considered as a binary variable. Here, we address the case in which the number of states is a parameter that can assume any value, from 2 to ∞, in the thermodynamic limit. We derive mean-field analytical expressions for the exit probability, the consensus time, and the number of different states as a function of time for the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the early time t = 1, {x} looks nearly uniform in all cases, but then evolves towards a distribution that depends on ∆. In the noiseless case ∆ = 0 (left column) the system reaches a final delta distribution corresponding to a configuration where all particles are in the same states cannot longer evolve, and corresponds to one of the S = 100 possible absorbing states of the MSVM [10,11]. Instead, for ∆ = 1 (center column) the distribution {x} becomes narrower with time and seems to adopt a bell shape for long times, while for ∆ = 5 (right column) {x} looks quite uniform for any time.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the early time t = 1, {x} looks nearly uniform in all cases, but then evolves towards a distribution that depends on ∆. In the noiseless case ∆ = 0 (left column) the system reaches a final delta distribution corresponding to a configuration where all particles are in the same states cannot longer evolve, and corresponds to one of the S = 100 possible absorbing states of the MSVM [10,11]. Instead, for ∆ = 1 (center column) the distribution {x} becomes narrower with time and seems to adopt a bell shape for long times, while for ∆ = 5 (right column) {x} looks quite uniform for any time.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the noiseless case ∆ = 0 the model is equivalent to the MSVM recently studied in the literature [10,11] where, in the above example, particle i simply jumps to the site occupied by particle j and stays there. In this case, given that the system is only driven by the stochastic nature of the copying process (the so called genetic drift in population genetics), a site that becomes empty remains empty afterwards, as particles can jump to occupied sites only.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, decision making systems (e.g., neural or animal groups) in nature can be offered multiple options. Numerical simulations, and potentially limited analyses, could be conducted for a dynamical model interpolating between the multistate voter model [35] and a generalization of the Potts model [36].…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Q}. The ordering dynamics of the model with no zealots has been discussed in [15], while a variant with committed agents on a weighted network has been more recently studied in [16]. Here, we are interested in a simple formulation of the model with N agents on the complete graph, for which we expect the mean field description to work well.…”
Section: Example 2: Multi-state Voter Model With Zealotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we define the truncated Taylor expansion 15) then q n,Q−1 = F n (1) represents the total number of matrix rows α for which χ αγ really needs to be computed. In Table 1, we report q n,Q−1 for the first few values of n and Q.…”
Section: Permutational Symmetry Of the Coefficients χ αγmentioning
confidence: 99%