A single animal group can display different types of collective motion at different times. For a one-dimensional individual-based model of self-organizing group formation, we show that repeated switching between distinct ordered collective states can occur entirely because of stochastic effects. We introduce a framework for the coarse-grained, computer-assisted analysis of such stochasticity-induced switching in animal groups. This involves the characterization of the behavior of the system with a single dynamically meaningful ''coarse observable'' whose dynamics are described by an effective Fokker-Planck equation. A ''lifting'' procedure is presented, which enables efficient estimation of the necessary macroscopic quantities for this description through short bursts of appropriately initialized computations. This leads to the construction of an effective potential, which is used to locate metastable collective states, and their parametric dependence, as well as estimate mean switching times.F ish, birds, and honey bees, as well as many other animal groups, display collective types of motion such as schooling, flocking, and swarming (1, 2). A single animal group can display different types of collective motion at different times, with Ͻ1 day of residence time in each state (3). Although such transitions could be due to changing behavioral rules or environmental factors, they also can occur entirely due to stochastic effects, as will be demonstrated for the model considered in this paper.One class of biologically motivated, individual-based models for group formation, frequently used for schooling fish, abstracts animal behavior by placing zones around individuals in which they respond to others through repulsion, alignment, and/or attraction (4-11). In the three-dimensional model of Couzin et al. (10), long-time steady-state computations revealed four different types of stable collective motion in different parameter regions: swarm, torus, dynamic parallel, and highly parallel. It was also shown that by changing the quantitative features of the behavioral rules (increasing or decreasing the radius of alignment), the collective state of the school could be changed.In ref. 10, stochasticity is incorporated by adding a small deviation to the heading of each individual obtained from the deterministic evolution algorithm. Our simulations show that if one instead considers relatively rare but substantial variations, namely that there is a small probability of each individual changing its direction substantially from that obtained from the deterministic algorithm, then for certain parameter regions multiple successive transitions between the torus and the dynamic parallel state can occur. See supporting information (SI) Fig. 7.In this paper, we study a one-dimensional individual-based model for group formation with stochasticity included along the lines of the variation described above. This system exhibits repeated stochasticity-induced switching between distinct ordered collective motion states. This switching appe...