2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ORDEM 3.0 and MASTER-2009 modeled debris population comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of collisions that will lead to further incidents will grow over time. This risk is particularly high for near-polar LEO orbits at around 800-900 km and the GEO region, as approximately 62% of functional satellites are in LEO and 31% in GEO [3,19]. As LEO is the region of greatest concern for the uncontrolled growth of debris, currently, the following mechanisms are considered vital to mitigate the debris population to a sustainable level: (1) post-mission disposal; (2) passivation; and, (3) active debris removal.…”
Section: The Status Of the Outer Space Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of collisions that will lead to further incidents will grow over time. This risk is particularly high for near-polar LEO orbits at around 800-900 km and the GEO region, as approximately 62% of functional satellites are in LEO and 31% in GEO [3,19]. As LEO is the region of greatest concern for the uncontrolled growth of debris, currently, the following mechanisms are considered vital to mitigate the debris population to a sustainable level: (1) post-mission disposal; (2) passivation; and, (3) active debris removal.…”
Section: The Status Of the Outer Space Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two elaborate models exist for the simulation of the space debris population, namely the Ordem model from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Master model from the European Space Agency (ESA). 3 Although in the Ordem model debris objects are categorized by their density, the great variety of debris objects considered in the Master model is grouped by its source of formation. This comprises fragments from explosions and collisions, sodium-potassium (NaK) droplets, slag from solid rocket motor (SRM) firing, SRM dust, multilayered insulation, paint flakes, ejecta, and clusters.…”
Section: Space Debris Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate and understand the risks to operational satellites, researchers use debris environment models to model the debris orbiting Earth (Klinkrad et al, 2001, Krisko, 2010. These models reliably predict the orbits of large fragments (>10 cm) using ground based sensors, but show discrepancies in modeling smaller but still dangerous fragments in the critical range (1 mm to 1 cm) which cannot be directly measured from Earth (Krisko et al, 2015). This discrepancy highlights the need for a more thorough understanding of HVI and fragmentation phenomena for modeling of the space debris environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%