The MOOC is dead-long live MOOC 2.0. The veracity of this claim depends to a great deal on who is making it. Or is the claim an example of the false "appeal to authority" argument denounced by logicians as crooked thinking? Or even an age-old "appeal to novelty" argument whereby new terms are deemed to be better than old ones without proof? The answer depends on how much evidence is produced for the idea that experts are always right (see Thouless, 1953). The evidence provided in the book edited by Ke Zhang, Curtis Bonk, Thomas Reeves, and Thomas Reynolds, MOOCs and Open Education in the Global South: Challenges, Successes, and Opportunities, which is reviewed in this issue reminds us that while the genesis of MOOCs lies in the affordances of connection and connectivity (Downes, 2012), MOOC ventures have since then followed various pathways and found favor in very different contexts. Most contemporary MOOC initiatives are in fact driven by aspirations very different from those envisaged by Siemens and Downes (see Siemens & Downes, 2008).So, while the aspirational goals of MOOCs may have gone unrealized, the idea of MOOCs has found meaningful traction in other forms and contexts. These include brand promotion by Ivy League institutions in emerging and open markets and monetization of online and distance learning opportunities. They also include the use of MOOCs for improving access to learning opportunities and empowerment of disadvantaged societies more broadly. The book by Zhang et al. is replete with examples from the Global South and especially from its less developed regions. These include the use of MOOCs for such purposes as skills development in a wide variety of areas, including literacy and numeracy, continuing professional development of the workforce, and capacity building in managing global challenges such as climate change and civic education.The editors of this book point out, and rightly so, that for people in the Global South, MOOCs offer hope and a path to empowerment and a chance to be part of a larger learning community. For many from this region, the MOOC offers not just a learning opportunity but access to award-winning teachers and researchers from top-tier educational institutions from throughout the world-people they would otherwise never know, let alone visit or learn from (Zhang et al., 2020, p. xxiv). In these regions, MOOCs are finding a useful and justifiable purpose. The story of MOOCs in this part of the world is, as such, very different from that envisaged in the Global North, where the MOOC phenomenon has been characterized as a passing fad, a failed pedagogy, and worse, an attempt by educational institutions to shake up the professoriate and replace them with a very different, and possibly cheaper, model of learning and teaching (see Baggaley, 2013Baggaley, , 2014aBaggaley, , 2014bNaidu, 2013;Rees, 2013).Recent reports such as those by Shah (2019aShah ( , 2019b suggest that the decline or death of MOOCs might be exaggerated. These reports show that in recent years, more than 100 ...