2010
DOI: 10.1080/08985620903220512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orchestrating innovation networks: The case of innovation brokers in the agri-food sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
148
0
12

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
148
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…project workshops, innovation cafés and partnership days, suitable for establishing collaborative innovation projects (Batterink et al 2010;Parjanen, Harmaakorpi, and Frantsi 2010). The version of NBIB described in this paper, however, was designed by the authors, and was intended as a fresh attempt to translate central dimensions of RIS-theory into manageable micro-level methods in order to better realize the pragmatic potential of the theory.…”
Section: What Is Network-based Innovation Brokering?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…project workshops, innovation cafés and partnership days, suitable for establishing collaborative innovation projects (Batterink et al 2010;Parjanen, Harmaakorpi, and Frantsi 2010). The version of NBIB described in this paper, however, was designed by the authors, and was intended as a fresh attempt to translate central dimensions of RIS-theory into manageable micro-level methods in order to better realize the pragmatic potential of the theory.…”
Section: What Is Network-based Innovation Brokering?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, interactions with knowledge-intensive sectors, given their importance in the generation and diffusion of innovations, can be strengthened (Mas Verdú et al, 2011). In this empowerment of innovation networks, the innovation brokers may have a key role (Batterink et al, 2010). The other is to enhance partnership between the business sector and public support services to R&D activities.…”
Section: Ine) Innovation In the Agri-food Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explanatory approaches looking at the mix between larger or smaller firms (Carlsson & Stankiewitz, 1991), and the presence and engagement of universities and R&D institutions (Mitra & Formica, 1997) may also be relevant to RINOs, as may those approaches focusing on trust or social capital (Johnsen, 2012;Rutten & Boekema, 2007). Finally, we have the explanatory approaches focusing on network orchestration (Batterink et al, 2010;Busquets, 2010;Gausdal & Nilsen, 2011), and on the existence and function of intermediaries (Dalziel & Parjanen, 2012;Gassmann et al, 2011;Howells, 2006). Typical of these explanatory factors is that they attend more to the network, cluster or RINO as a whole, than to individual members.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists an extensive literature discussing such variation and its causes. While some studies focus on how networks are managed or orchestrated (Batterink, Wubben, Klerkx & Omta, 2010;Busquets, 2010;Gausdal & Nilsen, 2011), others concentrate on the presence and function of intermediaries (Dalziel & Parjanen, 2012;Gassmann, Daiber & Enkel, 2011;Howells, 2006), on social capital (Johnsen, 2012;Rutten & Boekema, 2007), on the composition of the clusters or networks, or on other structural features (Capaldo, 2007;Olsen, Elvekrok, Gausdal, Nilsen & Scholderer, 2013). Typical of these explanatory endeavors is that they focus on the network or the cluster as a whole, and in this sense, they consider factors that are common for all the members of the network or cluster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%