2015
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Lesions Diagnosed during Oral Cancer Prevention Campaign in Fernandópolis, Brazil, 2015

Abstract: Background: To describe oral lesions diagnosed during oral cancer prevention campaign performed in Fernandópolis, Brazil, in 2015.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they did not show up for consultation. Our data were similar to those reported by Sankaranarayanan et al, 25 in which patient compliance was 58.88%, but compliance rates were lower than those reported by Monteiro et al, 20 Andrade, 1 and Tomo et al 21 in which the rates were as high as 96%, 81.25%, and 78.26%, respectively. Furthermore, Monteiro et al 20 reported that patients attending to his screening program were "health literate," which explains the high compliance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, they did not show up for consultation. Our data were similar to those reported by Sankaranarayanan et al, 25 in which patient compliance was 58.88%, but compliance rates were lower than those reported by Monteiro et al, 20 Andrade, 1 and Tomo et al 21 in which the rates were as high as 96%, 81.25%, and 78.26%, respectively. Furthermore, Monteiro et al 20 reported that patients attending to his screening program were "health literate," which explains the high compliance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the current study, the prevalence of oral lesions was 10.38% and that of OPMD and SCC was 04.34%, which is in accordance with other studies. 17,[19][20][21] If we consider only high-risk patients, the prevalence of OPMD and SCC rises to 6.07%, which is slightly higher than what has been observed in previous studies. 17,[19][20][21] Chang et al 19 reported a prevalence of positive lesions of 5.20%, but the high prevalence might be because their study was performed at a tertiary health care academic medical center, thus showing a higher chance of diagnosing positive lesions, given that patients at a hospital are more likely to have a disease.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations