2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence visualization improves the detection of oral, potentially malignant, disorders in population screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the stance of early diagnostics, or in terms of secondary prevention, to be exact, where primary-care doctors are employed mostly, the detection of precancerous and malignant tumors in the main group (using the new method) featured significant differences compared to the traditional method. A number of previous studies claim that visual examination cannot be viewed as a diagnostic test when it comes to differential diagnostics, so there are also additional fluorescent and a number of other tests used, which, given our observations, proved effective when combined with the available conventional traditional ones [22,24,25,26].…”
Section: Table 2 Comparative Features (%) Of the Disease Symptoms Identified Through The Clinical Examination The Main Group (M1) And Thementioning
confidence: 62%
“…From the stance of early diagnostics, or in terms of secondary prevention, to be exact, where primary-care doctors are employed mostly, the detection of precancerous and malignant tumors in the main group (using the new method) featured significant differences compared to the traditional method. A number of previous studies claim that visual examination cannot be viewed as a diagnostic test when it comes to differential diagnostics, so there are also additional fluorescent and a number of other tests used, which, given our observations, proved effective when combined with the available conventional traditional ones [22,24,25,26].…”
Section: Table 2 Comparative Features (%) Of the Disease Symptoms Identified Through The Clinical Examination The Main Group (M1) And Thementioning
confidence: 62%
“…20 Dessa forma, podemos verificar a importância da educação continuada visando a capacitação dos profissionais envolvidos, os métodos de diagnósticos no reconhecimento das condições cancerizáveis e sobre o encaminhamento responsável, é de extrema importância. 21,22…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Higher sensitivity (but lower specificity) in detecting oral cancer lesions in a cohort of 123 patients with premalignant oral lesions was reported by Rana et al [79]. By including AFI in a population screening for oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders, Simonato et al found that AFI had a higher sensitivity (94.4%) and specificity (96.2%) over conventional oral examination (83.3% sensitivity and 95.1% specificity), and should therefore be considered as an adjunctive method for early diagnosis of high-risk oral lesions [80]. These positive findings, indicating additional diagnostic accuracy, could not be reproduced by Koch et al when 78 patients with suspicious oral mucosal lesions were assessed for oral dysplasia and carcinoma using the VELscope [81].…”
Section: Af In Oral Medicinementioning
confidence: 97%