1981
DOI: 10.1093/ohr/9.1.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral History and the Writing of Ethnic History: A Reconnaissance into Method and Theory

Abstract: Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Oral history has a wide range of applications in studies of marketing, markets and the consumer. In technical terms, it is a method of gathering historical data, but it can also be approached as a subject matter through which to investigate memory (Frisch, 1990; Grele, 1985; Portelli, 1979; Thompson, 1981; Thompson, 1998), as well as a conceptual approach for understanding historical events (Okihiro, 1981). As a methodological approach, oral history shares much in common with many qualitative and interpretive approaches in marketing research which afford a certain centrality and priority to consumer voices and testimony (Elliott and Davies, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral history has a wide range of applications in studies of marketing, markets and the consumer. In technical terms, it is a method of gathering historical data, but it can also be approached as a subject matter through which to investigate memory (Frisch, 1990; Grele, 1985; Portelli, 1979; Thompson, 1981; Thompson, 1998), as well as a conceptual approach for understanding historical events (Okihiro, 1981). As a methodological approach, oral history shares much in common with many qualitative and interpretive approaches in marketing research which afford a certain centrality and priority to consumer voices and testimony (Elliott and Davies, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretations of maps were supplemented with the analysis of archival records (Okihiro 1981). These gave us information on the perspective of the government on the utility of the water body and its surroundings, and in some cases described conflicts around the use of the commons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However there are limitations arising from complete reliance on archival material. Written records, prepared in an environment where literacy was not the norm and coming largely from official sources, represent documentation influenced by positions that were clearly reflective of their time and environment (Okihiro 1981;Thompson 2000;Portelli 2010). Archival information was collected from the holdings of the Karnataka State Archives in Bengaluru.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this history, Achebe makes a critical political lesson to future leaders to avoid falling into depraved practices of their predecessors, what Mbembe (2015) calls a "negative moment" in, for example, his South Africa of today, a moment many African countries have experienced: you oust a dictator to establish a worse dictatorship! Crucially, therefore, it is a political statement of how African literature should act a liberating teacher to Africans in conflict resolution: how to reshape her future in a more liberating and humanizing way from recycling atrocities, animalism, individualism; it is a "recreation of a social consciousness" a living testimony for a better ideological orientation, a meaningful change… (Ulogu and Ogiageli Udogu: 2018;Rumana Sididdique: 2017;Okihiro: 1981;Amuta: 1983;Rodrigues: 2007;Neimneh and Abussamen: 2017;Zapata: 1993;Dwivedi: 2008;Olufunwa: 2002;. This is why storytellers are hated by autocrats; they say too many revealing things: "storytellers are a threat.…”
Section: D) the Story Of Perennial Deprivation Among The Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%