Oral Health–Related Quality of Life in Partially Edentulous Patients Treated with Removable, Fixed, Fixed-Removable, and Implant-Supported Prostheses

Гуревич, К. Г.; Fabrikant, Ekaterina; Hassan, Mona; Aqou, Shorouq

doi:10.11607/ijp.3692

Cited by 47 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…e ultimate goal of dental and orofacial treatment is not only to treat oral disease but also to improve patients' quality of life [1]. Tooth decay, periodontal disease, trauma, tumour resection, and orthognathic treatment are the most common causes of tooth loss [2] resulting in aesthetic, functional, psychological, and social implications [2][3][4] that reduce patients' quality of life [5,6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence of Immediately Loaded Basal Implant Treatment on Patient Satisfaction

Awadalkreem

Khalifa

Satti

et al. 2020

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Improving patient satisfaction and quality of life is of great importance when considering the different prosthetic treatment options for patients with severely resorbed residual alveolar ridges. We aimed to evaluate and compare patients’ satisfaction when changing from fixed, removable, and/or conventional implant prostheses to basal implant-supported prostheses. Methods. Sixty patients with a history of fixed, removable, and/or conventional implant prostheses who received basal implant-supported prostheses (BCS®, IHDE Implant System) were included in this study. Direct interviews were conducted using a four-section questionnaire that covered sociodemographic data, clinical examination, information on previous prostheses, and new implant information. The obtained data were statistically analysed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test and chi-squared test. Results. Patients were predominantly female, partially edentulous, and aged between 40 and 59 years. Patients’ general satisfaction with basal implants was very high (7.7 out of 8). Patients’ satisfaction with comfort, mastication, speech, and aesthetics significantly improved with the new basal implants. Males aged between 40 and 59 years and patients who had previously used both fixed and removable prostheses were generally the most satisfied. Although some patients had complaints, they still had high satisfaction and would choose the same treatment modality again. Conclusions. Basal implant-supported prostheses have a positive impact on oral health and highly increase patients’ satisfaction.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence of Immediately Loaded Basal Implant Treatment on Patient Satisfaction

Awadalkreem

Khalifa

Satti

et al. 2020

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 7 In another study, PRO was used to evaluate the effect of prosthodontic treatment. 8 Although studies related to implant treatment have been performed in other countries, 9 10 11 few studies involve Japanese. Thus, the aim of this study was to use PRO to evaluate oral health status and implant treatment in Japanese patients with missing teeth.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral health-related quality of life in patients with implant treatment

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSEPatient-reported outcomes are increasingly commonly used as a method of evaluating treatments. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate implant treatment from the perspective of patient-reported outcomes.MATERIALS AND METHODSSubjects were 804 patients who visited the Department of Oral Implantology at Osaka Dental University. The participants were categorized into a pre-implant group and a post-implant group. They were further categorized into five subgroups based on the number of occlusal supports provided by the remaining teeth according to the Eichner classification. The participants answered a basic questionnaire and the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) questionnaire, an oral health-related quality of life (QOL) scale. GOHAI scores were compared according to the number of occlusal supports within each group and between the two groups.RESULTSThe results revealed a significant difference in terms of the number of occlusal supports within the pre-implant group; GOHAI scores decreased as the number of occlusal supports decreased (P<.001). However, no significant difference was observed in GOHAI scores in terms of the number of occlusal supports in the post-implant group (P>.05). GOHAI scores significantly improved in both pre- and post-implant groups in all occlusal support subgroups (P<.001).CONCLUSIONGOHAI scores decrease as occlusal support is lost. However, implant treatment performed in areas of loss improves the GOHAI score when occlusal support is restored.

show abstract

“…The first of these is that dental implants improve QoL and is shown in previous studies which compare QoL between pre- versus postoral rehabilitation [15–17]. Furthermore, literature suggests that tooth loss and reduced chewing ability are related to poor oral health QoL [18] and that dental implant supported tooth replacement improves QoL in improved comfort, speech, chewing function, and fit [19].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental Implant Supported Restorations Improve Quality of Life in Osteoporotic Women

DeBaz

Hahn

Lang

et al. 2015

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. The aim of this study is to compare the quality of life (QoL) in partially edentulous osteoporotic women who have missing teeth restored with dental implant retained restorations with those who do not and, secondarily, to report the rate of osteonecrosis in this sample. Methods. 237 participants completed the Utian QoL survey, a 23-question document measuring across psychosocial domains of well-being including occupational, health, emotional, and sexual domains which together contribute to an overall score. The subset of participants having dental implant supported prosthesis (64) was compared to the subset having nonimplant supported fixed restorations (47), the subset having nonimplant supported removable restorations (60), and the subset having no restoration of missing teeth (66). Results. ANOVA showed significant difference in all QoL domains between the four subsets (p < 0.05). Although 134 reported oral bisphosphonate and 51 reported IV bisphosphonate use, no signs of ONJ were identified in any participants. Conclusion. These findings show implant retained oral rehabilitation has a statistically significant impact over nonimplant and traditional fixed restorations, removable restorations, and no restoration of missing teeth in far reaching areas including occupational, health, emotional, sexual, and overall QoL. These findings also support future examination of psychosocial outcomes associated with oral rehabilitation and the incorporation of oral health into women's health promotion.

show abstract

Oral Health–Related Quality of Life in Partially Edentulous Patients Treated with Removable, Fixed, Fixed-Removable, and Implant-Supported Prostheses

Cited by 47 publications

References 37 publications

The Influence of Immediately Loaded Basal Implant Treatment on Patient Satisfaction

The Influence of Immediately Loaded Basal Implant Treatment on Patient Satisfaction

Oral health-related quality of life in patients with implant treatment

Dental Implant Supported Restorations Improve Quality of Life in Osteoporotic Women

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About