2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04359-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral health–related quality of life (OHRQOL) of preschool children’s anterior teeth restored with zirconia crowns versus resin-bonded composite strip crowns: a 12-month prospective clinical trial

Abstract: Objectives To compare oral health–related quality of Life (OHRQOL) of preschool children’s anterior teeth restored with prefabricated zirconia crowns (ZC) versus resin-bonded composite strip crown (RCSC). Materials and methods A prospective clinical trial included 136 children with early childhood caries aged 36–71 months who were assigned into prefabricated ZC and RCSC groups. A total of 344 teeth were restored either with 170 ZCs (49.4%) and 174 RCSCs (5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For another exploratory outcome, the differences of motor function scores and those of VFSS were analyzed by Spearman correlation coefficient, without p-value adjustment; hence statistically significant levels were not set in this study. The non-parametric effect size (r) was calculated by dividing the absolute standardized statistic (z) of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test by the square root of the pair number (z/√N) [ 24 ]. Interpreting the “r” values was as follows: small effect size (r < 0.3), moderate effect size (r = 0.3–0.8), and large effect size (r > 0.8) [ 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For another exploratory outcome, the differences of motor function scores and those of VFSS were analyzed by Spearman correlation coefficient, without p-value adjustment; hence statistically significant levels were not set in this study. The non-parametric effect size (r) was calculated by dividing the absolute standardized statistic (z) of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test by the square root of the pair number (z/√N) [ 24 ]. Interpreting the “r” values was as follows: small effect size (r < 0.3), moderate effect size (r = 0.3–0.8), and large effect size (r > 0.8) [ 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-parametric effect size (r) was calculated by dividing the absolute standardized statistic (z) of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test by the square root of the pair number (z/√N) [ 24 ]. Interpreting the “r” values was as follows: small effect size (r < 0.3), moderate effect size (r = 0.3–0.8), and large effect size (r > 0.8) [ 24 ]. Because nonparametric statistics were applied in this study, the Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the three evaluators for total scores, scores during the oral and pharyngeal phases, and DOSS scores [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PZCs showed signi cantly less plaque accumulation and gingival in ammation when compared to conventional stainless-steel crowns [4,7,8]. Moreover, the oral health-related quality of life of preschool children that were restored with PZCs was signi cantly better than that of those who received resinbonded composite strip crowns [9,10]. However, concerns about the retention of PZCs have arisen due to their limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…76 The OHRQoL of preschool children treated with zirconia crowns was described as significantly better as compared to those who received resin-bonded composite strip crowns. An adapted and validated Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) questionnaire could be an excellent tool to distinguish children without agenesis from those with a moderate to high percentage of missing teeth, like it has been made for caries experience, 77 or to determine the impact of dental treatment on OHRQoL. 78 There is still no evidence of a longterm survival of mandibular 2pm, and to accurately answer the typical questions from the patient: "For how long can my primary tooth survive if we decide to leave it in situ?"…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%