Oral Health-Related Quality of Life

Schütte, Uwe; Walter, Michael

doi:10.1007/978-0-387-78665-0_108

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Self‐rated oral health (SROH) and oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) have been recommended as two constructs that may facilitate dentists’ assessments of how poor oral health might affect people (1‐3). Self‐rated oral health is generally assessed using a single‐item global question and is broadly utilized in dentistry to evaluate people’s perception of their oral health (3‐5).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Oral health‐related quality of life is a multidimensional construct that incorporates, according to Schütte & Walter (1), an individual's perceptions of: (i) their illness or health; (ii) functional, psychological, social, and economic implications; (iii) any resulting limitations on daily activities; and (iv) the success of a given treatment. The World Dental Federation (FDI) recently published a policy statement on OHRQoL stating that ‘OHRQoL measures combined with clinical and behavioural indicators should be incorporated into assessments of oral healthcare needs of populations, to provide a comprehensive and holistic approach to planning oral health services' (13).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In recent years, there has been increased recognition that traditional clinical measures of oral health and treatment needs should be supplemented by information on subjective experiences and concerns that individuals have with their oral diseases or disorders, in order to improve both the quality of dental care provided by professionals and health systems and the satisfaction of patients (1,2). In addition, evidence has shown that that oral diseases produce significant impacts, not only on physical health but also on mental and social well‐being, areas not included in conventional measurement instruments (1,2).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Oral health literacy, self‐rated oral health, and oral health‐related quality of life in Brazilian adults

Bado

Checchi

Cortellazzi

et al. 2020

European J Oral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oral health literacy, self-rated oral health, and oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian adults Bado FMR, De Checchi MHR, Cortellazzi KL, Ju X, Jamieson L, Mialhe FL. Oral health literacy, self-rated oral health, and oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian adults. Eur J Oral Sci 2020; 128: 218-225. © 2020 Eur J Oral SciThe aim of this study was to investigate associations between oral health literacy (OHL), self-rated oral health (SROH), and oral health-related quality of life (OHR-QoL) in Brazilian adults. A sample of 523 Brazilian adults completed the shortform Health Literacy in Dentistry (HeLD-14) and the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) instruments that measure OHL and OHRQoL, respectively. The prevalence ratios (PRs) for outcome variables and their 95% CIs were quantified. Multivariable log-binomial regression models were applied, as the statistical models, to estimate bivariate and multivariable relationships of oral health outcomes with OHL, after adjusting for covariates. No significant association was found between poor SROH (as measured by single items) and OHL (PR = 1.28; 95% CI: 0.87-1.88); by contrast, significant associations were found between poor SROH and income (PR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.04-2.21), toothbrushing frequency (PR = 1.69; 95% CI: 1.11-2.58), reason for dental visiting (PR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.03-2.13), and self-rated general health (PR = 3.44; 95% CI: 2.38-4.97). The OHL level (PR = 1.76; 95% CI: 1.21-2.56), educational level (PR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.41-0.93), reason for dental visiting (PR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.30-2.61), and self-rated general health (PR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.03-2.23) were associated with poor OHRQoL.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Oral health literacy, self‐rated oral health, and oral health‐related quality of life in Brazilian adults

Bado

Checchi

Cortellazzi

et al. 2020

European J Oral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Slade describes it as the shift in the perception of health from merely the absence of disease and infirmity to complete physical, mental, and social well-being. 4 The literature suggests that children with autism are more likely to experience oral health problems than their peers without autism due to various associated conditions like sensory abnormalities, motor deficits, and medical conditions like mood disorders, epilepsy, and hyperactivity disorder. [5][6][7] Detrimental oral habits like lip biting, bruxism and tongue thrusting are found among children with ASD, contributing to poor oral health status.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Oral health‐related quality of life is an essential component of general health. Slade describes it as the shift in the perception of health from merely the absence of disease and infirmity to complete physical, mental, and social well‐being 4 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parental perspectives on oral health‐related quality of life in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review

Goswami,

Bhatara,

Bhatara

et al. 2023

Special Care in Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundChildren with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) face unique challenges related to oral health, which can negatively impact their day‐to‐day lives, significantly compromising their overall quality of life. Primary caregivers of children with ASD have a critical role in delivering and seeking oral health care. Hence, it is vital to study their perspective towards their children's oral health and its impact on their quality of life.AimTo explore the parental perception of oral health‐related quality of life in children with autism.MethodsA systematic electronic and manual search was conducted in Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus, and LILACS of articles published from January 2003 to May 2023 using appropriate MeSH terms, keywords, and other terms. A four‐phase study selection process was followed according to PRISMA guidelines, and data extraction and synthesis were performed using an extraction form. The selected studies were critically appraised using the QATSDD and Crombie's assessment tool. The inter‐reviewer agreement was assessed using the kappa with a linear weighting coefficient.ResultsOut of the 885 results, 15 studies were included in the review after the two selection phases, and the study characteristics were summarized in tabular form. Study quality varied considerably, and out of a total possible QATSDD score of 42, scores for the individual studies ranged from 14 to 40. The risk of bias for the seven criteria was found to be low.ConclusionThe parental perception of the OHRQoL in children with ASD is poor, and the most significant perceived impact is on the child's functional and social well‐being aspects. Parental‐Caregiver Perception Questionnaire was the most commonly used. The most frequent symptoms include bad breath, food lodgment, mouth breathing and night grinding. The familial impact and influence on the OHRQoL of siblings were also studied.

show abstract

Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Dental Implant and Prosthesis Interventions: A Systematic Review

TEKPINAR¹,

Mehmet²,

Yiğit³

2021

International Journal of Health Management and Tourism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim of this review is to compare cost-effectiveness in the implant and prosthesis for missing teeth, and to explore the methods used in cost-effectiveness analysis using published studies. A systematic review was conducted on cost-effectiveness analysis in the dental implant and prosthesis for single, partial or complete replacement via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO and Cochrane Library databases. Review was restricted to published articles in English language without time limit. Reporting quality assessment of dental replacement cost-effectiveness analysis used the Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) extended checklist guidelines. Of the 526 publications identified initially, a total of 17 studies on the cost-effectiveness of dental implants and prosthesis were included in the systematic review. Of these, 8 (47.1%) were originated in the last four years. Most of articles (n=8, 47.1%) were on the cost-effectiveness for single-tooth replacement. The median of reporting quality of studies, assessed by the CHEC extended checklist is 74% (from 55% to 90%). Ten studies were able to define the most cost-effective among the interventions compared. Most studies were in concurrence that over the long term, dental implants represent a cost-effective treatment option. The methodology for the economic evaluation of prosthetic treatments is quite complex. Although there are concepts such as QAPY and QATY introduced into the literature, their applications have remained rather limited and not developed. The majority of studies were able to provide conclusions regarding the most cost-effective intervention among the different options compared: this will assist in healthcare decision-making and resource allocation. For edentation, implant was cost-effective treatment option in comparison with dental prosthesis.

show abstract

Oral Health-Related Quality of Life

Cited by 3 publications

References 31 publications

Oral health literacy, self‐rated oral health, and oral health‐related quality of life in Brazilian adults

Oral health literacy, self‐rated oral health, and oral health‐related quality of life in Brazilian adults

Parental perspectives on oral health‐related quality of life in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review

Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Dental Implant and Prosthesis Interventions: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About