2017
DOI: 10.11138/ccmbm/2017.14.1.207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral calcidiol is a good form of vitamin D supplementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until a few years ago, the guidelines estimated that the daily intake of vitamin D required to maintain adequate levels in the blood was 200 IU (5 mcg) in adults 19‒50 years of age, 400 IU (10 mcg) in adults 51‒69, and at least 600 IU (15 mcg) in those >70. 31 , 34 These guidelines have now been revised and it is currently believed that the amount of vitamin D that should be taken daily is 2,000 IU (50 mcg) or, in certain cases (e.g., for pregnant women), up to 4,000 IU (100 mcg). 31 , 34 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Until a few years ago, the guidelines estimated that the daily intake of vitamin D required to maintain adequate levels in the blood was 200 IU (5 mcg) in adults 19‒50 years of age, 400 IU (10 mcg) in adults 51‒69, and at least 600 IU (15 mcg) in those >70. 31 , 34 These guidelines have now been revised and it is currently believed that the amount of vitamin D that should be taken daily is 2,000 IU (50 mcg) or, in certain cases (e.g., for pregnant women), up to 4,000 IU (100 mcg). 31 , 34 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 31 , 34 These guidelines have now been revised and it is currently believed that the amount of vitamin D that should be taken daily is 2,000 IU (50 mcg) or, in certain cases (e.g., for pregnant women), up to 4,000 IU (100 mcg). 31 , 34 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obese patients (BMI > 30 kg/m 2 ) might require 2–3 times more vitamin D to both treat and prevent vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency [ 141 ]. Due to its pharmacokinetic profile, calcifediol might represent an alternative option [ 103 , 142 , 143 , 144 ].…”
Section: Special Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…suggested that (i) single vitamin D 3 bolus doses ≥300 000 IU represent a better option than previously described dose regimens in order to obtain a sufficient vitamin D status for up to 3 months and (ii) that vitamin D 3 is superior to vitamin D 2 in achieving higher and more sustained serum vitamin D levels. More recently, it was shown that oral calcifediol (25‐OH‐D 3 )—especially at the daily dose of 40 μg—should be preferred to oral cholecalciferol (D 3 ) because: (i) it induces a more rapid increase in serum vitamin D levels and in a linear dose–response fashion; (ii) it is more potent and therefore requires lower dosages; (iii) it displays better intestinal absorption; (iv) it provides a more stable serum vitamin D status . These recent new evidences on dose regimes of vitamin D supplementation might explain why approximately one billion people worldwide were previously reported to suffer from vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency despite the vast availability of oral vitamin D supplements …”
Section: Vitamin D Supplementationmentioning
confidence: 99%