2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Bisacodyl Is Effective and Well-Tolerated in Patients With Chronic Constipation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
116
0
15

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
116
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodology of the trials has been described in detail previously [7] [8]. In brief, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with either bisacodyl tablets or SPS drops, respectively, was followed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methodology of the trials has been described in detail previously [7] [8]. In brief, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with either bisacodyl tablets or SPS drops, respectively, was followed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only minor amounts are systemically absorbed but are not considered to contribute to the laxative action since the laxative effect of bisacodyl or SPS does not correlate with the plasma level of BHPM. The clinical efficacy of bisacodyl and SPS is generally not questioned and was further confirmed by recently conducted stateof-the-art trials [7] [8]. In these randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trials, measures of quality of life (QoL) were obtained by the PAC-QoL questionnaire in addition to the bowel movement frequency, which is commonly used as objective outcome parameter in clinical trials to assess the efficacy of laxative treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…132,138,139 A senna-fiber combination was more effective than lactulose in treating constipation in geriatric long-stay patients. 116,140 A meta-analysis found that stimulant laxatives provided superior efficacy for chronic idiopathic constipation (relative risk, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.69).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the correlation between aggregate measures of published studies addressing bowel patterns and pain correspond with results of a pilot study, which demonstrated a significant relationship between changes in bowel frequency and pain ratings for individual patients receiving linaclotide for constipation. 62 The described correlation between improved pain ratings were not only reported in studies of the newly introduced agents for IBS-C, [63][64][65][66][67] but were also observed in many other trials, which did not meet inclusion criteria for this analysis and examined the effects of interventions ranging from fiber supplements, 68,69 to herbal preparations, 70 biofeedback, 71 bisacodyl, 72 or osmotic laxatives. [73][74][75] While not the focus of this analysis, we noted some statistically significant, but clinically minor, differences in the endpoints between patient cohorts with constipation and IBS-C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%