1970
DOI: 10.1136/sti.46.1.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral ampicillin in gonorrhoea. Clinical evaluation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

1971
1971
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results with ampicillin do not agree with those of several workers, notably Groth and Hallqvist (1970), Willcox and others (1973), Cobbold and others (1973), and Jersild and Svendsen (1973).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results with ampicillin do not agree with those of several workers, notably Groth and Hallqvist (1970), Willcox and others (1973), Cobbold and others (1973), and Jersild and Svendsen (1973).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…of our cases by oral administration of two doses of 1 g. ampicillin. Eriksson (1970a) and Groth and Hallqvist (1970) obtained the same cure-rate in their patients who received the same dosage administered with a 5-hour interval.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The best results appeared to have followed treatment with ampicillin given in divided doses, a finding recently corroborated by Groth and Hallqvist (1970).…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…When we changed over to treating gonorrhoea with oral ampicillin in 1967, the few published reports on this type of therapy mostly lacked information on the Received for publication May 11, 1971 Address for reprints: Tietgensgade 31, Copenhagen, Denmark penicillin sensitivity of the gonococcal strains (Alergant, 1963;Marmell, Sills, Brown, and Prigot, 1964;Willcox, 1963Willcox, , 1964, and presented varying results derived from small numbers of cases. The best results appeared to have followed treatment with ampicillin given in divided doses, a finding recently corroborated by Groth and Hallqvist (1970).…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%