2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Optional’ ergativity and the framing of reported speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, while the animacy factor can more easily be related to more classic types of case systems, factors like episode-level unexpectedness and focus seem to belong wholly to the pragmatic domain of information structure. However, this is not necessarily a reason to deny such systems the status of ergative or even of case system (see also McGregor, 2010, andRumsey, 2010, for further arguments).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, while the animacy factor can more easily be related to more classic types of case systems, factors like episode-level unexpectedness and focus seem to belong wholly to the pragmatic domain of information structure. However, this is not necessarily a reason to deny such systems the status of ergative or even of case system (see also McGregor, 2010, andRumsey, 2010, for further arguments).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already mentioned, there are a number of other Australian languages that have OEM, like Gooniyandi (McGregor, 1992, 1998), Warrwa (McGregor, 2006, Kuuk Thaayorre (Gaby, 2008(Gaby, , 2010, Bunuba (Rumsey, 2000(Rumsey, , 2010, Jingulu (Pensalfini, 1999), Gurindji Kriol, Light Warlpiri O'Shannessy, 2004, 2010), and Jaminjung (Schultze-Berndt, 2006). McGregor (2010) provides a more exhaustive list, in the context of a broader typological study of languages with OEM.…”
Section: Animacy and Focus In Other Oem Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Enga it seems that OEM of Agent NPs is possible only for clauses of thought and speech that frame complement clauses (Li and Lang, 1979:320-321). (See further Merlan and Rumsey, 2001;Rumsey, 1994Rumsey, , 2010 for discussion of OEM in complement clauses. )…”
Section: Grammatical Distribution Of Optional Ergative Case Markingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The status of kuN[ ]=yi as a superordinate framing verb for both preverbs and complement clauses1 is guaranteed by its obligatory indexation of celestial morphology: kuN[ ]=yi can never appear without celestial indexation, and only this class is permitted in its undergoer slot. A comprehensive survey of the relationship between framing verbs and framed clauses is to be found in Rumsey (2010), who documents the widespread cross-linguistic treatment of framed clauses as grammatical undergoers.…”
Section: Fourteen: Complement Clausesmentioning
confidence: 99%