2014
DOI: 10.1057/jdhf.2014.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Option pricing with a dynamic fat-tailed model

Abstract: International audienceIn the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, the need to consider more realistic risk models for derivative products has received renewed attention. We introduce a dynamic model for the pricing of European-style options with various attractive features such as a mixture of heavy-tails and Gaussian distribution along with a leverage effect property. We test the model on FTSE 100 stock index options during the period of January 2008 to June 2009. Our empirical results show that the model … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because leverage can be a measurement of firm risk, it can also influence the degree of volatility skew. Results provided by Vargas et al , Aboura et al , Kim et al , Chang and Lin , Borland and Bouchaud , and Jones are consistent with the leverage hypothesis. The relationship between the leverage effect and the volatility smile seems to be closer than that between the leverage effect and the AVP.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because leverage can be a measurement of firm risk, it can also influence the degree of volatility skew. Results provided by Vargas et al , Aboura et al , Kim et al , Chang and Lin , Borland and Bouchaud , and Jones are consistent with the leverage hypothesis. The relationship between the leverage effect and the volatility smile seems to be closer than that between the leverage effect and the AVP.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The curve of volatility against strike prices in equity options exhibits a negative slope. The close relationship between a firm's leverage and volatility skewness has been confirmed in studies by Vargas, Dao, and Bouchaud , Aboura, Valeyre, and Wagner , Dennis and Mayhew , Kim, Lee, Hwang, Kim, and Ko , Chang and Lin , Borland and Bouchaud , and Jones .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…One limitation is that the CCM assumes Gaussian distributed probability distributions with constant volatility, while risky-asset returns have empirical distributions with fat tails and volatility clusters and actual default probability distributions are fat tailed. In the literature various methods are proposed to remedy the assumption of a Gaussian distribution for the underlying asset returns, such as alternative volatility models or adjustments of the default probability (see Aboura et al, 2014 for an overview). We apply the latter method by mapping the risk-neutral default probabilities onto actual sovereign default data.…”
Section: Application Of the Ccmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) asymmetric distributions, such as skewed-t [19], variance gamma [20], Weibull [21], and distorted lognormal distribution [22]; and (3) mixture distribution such as the mixture of Gaussian and heavy-tailed model [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%