Optimum utilisation of intravascular radiological contrast media

Grainger, Ronald G.

doi:10.1007/bf00171397

Eur. Radiol.

1992

DOI: 10.1007/bf00171397

|View full text |Cite

Optimum utilisation of intravascular radiological contrast media

Ronald G. Grainger¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1993

2005

Publication Types

Select...

Article6

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on 109 546 cases PALMER (26) was able to calculate the risk of moderate and severe reaction in high and low risk groups. The patients were selected according to the guidelines of the Royal College of Radiologists in the United Kingdom issued in 1984 (15). The results (Table 3) imply that it is more hazardous to be a low-risk patient who is given an ionic high-osmolar CM than a high-risk patient who is given a nonionic low-osmolar CM.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

High-Osmolar and Low-Osmolar Contrast Media

Thomsen

Dorph

1993

Acta Radiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the past 3 years a great number of papers about adverse drug reactions to intravascular injection of high-osmolar and lowosmolar iodinated contrast media (CM) have been published. They include observational studies, randomized trials, meta-analyses and committee reports. Thorough analysis of this material substantiates an improvement in safety of at least 6-fold using non ionic lowosmolar CM compared with ionic high-osmolar CM. The point where only a small minority is continuing to argue effectively that low-osmolar CM are not better than conventional high-osmolar CM has now been reached. High-osmolar CM are used less and less for intravascular purposes, and, in fact, have been totally replaced by low-osmolar CM in 4 countries.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

High-Osmolar and Low-Osmolar Contrast Media

Thomsen

Dorph

1993

Acta Radiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Intravenous excretory urography using Optiray in office urology

Koncz¹

1995

International Urology and Nephrology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Experiences with the nonionic contrast medium Optiray 300 were analyzed in 120 consecutive patients who underwent intravenous urography. Allergic diathesis was recorded prior to the examination in 12.5% of the patients, pretreatment was given in only 3 cases. The clinical safety of Optiray was outstanding, no adverse reactions were noted. Diagnostic quality of the radiographs was excellent in 78% and good in 22% of the cases. Optiray is considered to be a safe and effective contrast agent for use in intravenous excretory urography.

show abstract

Stents versus Angioplasty in Renal Artery Stenosis

Sos

2001

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Optimum utilisation of intravascular radiological contrast media

Cited by 6 publications

References 8 publications

High-Osmolar and Low-Osmolar Contrast Media

High-Osmolar and Low-Osmolar Contrast Media

Intravenous excretory urography using Optiray in office urology

Stents versus Angioplasty in Renal Artery Stenosis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About