2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum sampling time and frequency for measuring N 2 O emissions from a rain-fed cereal cropping system

Abstract: Annual cumulative nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from soil have historically been calculated from intermittent data measured manually via the static chamber method. The temporal variability in emissions, both diurnally and between days, introduces uncertainty into the up-scaling of static chamber data. This study assessed the most appropriate time of the day to sample and the best sampling frequency to ensure reliable estimates of annual cumulative emissions. Sub-daily N2O emissions were measured using automati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gas sampling was undertaken between 10.00 and 14.00 hours, as this was reported to best represent the average daily flux (Smith and Dobbie, 2001;van der Weerden et al, 2013). Reeves and Wang, (2015) refined the optimum sampling time to between mid-morning (09:00) and midday (12:00) as sampling conducted in the early afternoon was observed to overestimate daily emissions due to higher soil temperatures. Headspace samples (20 ml at HB, 10 ml at JC and MP) were taken after a 40 min chamber closure period on four occasions per week during the first and second week after N application, reducing to twice per week for the next two weeks and then once per week until the next N application.…”
Section: N 2 O Measurement and Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gas sampling was undertaken between 10.00 and 14.00 hours, as this was reported to best represent the average daily flux (Smith and Dobbie, 2001;van der Weerden et al, 2013). Reeves and Wang, (2015) refined the optimum sampling time to between mid-morning (09:00) and midday (12:00) as sampling conducted in the early afternoon was observed to overestimate daily emissions due to higher soil temperatures. Headspace samples (20 ml at HB, 10 ml at JC and MP) were taken after a 40 min chamber closure period on four occasions per week during the first and second week after N application, reducing to twice per week for the next two weeks and then once per week until the next N application.…”
Section: N 2 O Measurement and Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The containers had a radius of 8 cm and a height of 10 cm and volume of 2 L. The soil depth was 7 cm and each treatment was replicated four times. At the completion of the experiment, 20 g of soil was mixed with 20 mL of water, centrifuged, and analyzed for dissolved organic C (Rice et al, 2012).…”
Section: Soil Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings suggest that GHG emissions and soil moisture cycles were offset from each other, and that gas samples collected at 700 h would underestimate GHG emissions, while samples collected at 1400 h would overestimate emissions. Others have noted that the sampling protocols can impact calculated GHG emissions (Parkin, 2008;Reeves and Wang, 2015).…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of chambers was decreased to one replicated chamber within each treatment per experimental plot (n = 3 per treatment) over the fallow period when only small fluxes (<5.0 g N 2 O-N ha -1 day -1 ) were observed in all treatments. Sampling frequency was optimised according to the recommendations of Reeves and Wang (2015). Specifically, measurements were conducted three times a week immediately after fertilisation followed by heavy rainfall events and weekly over the remaining period, which was expected to provide a highly accurate estimate (AE10% error) compared with measurements with a sub-daily temporal resolution (Reeves and Wang 2015).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling frequency was optimised according to the recommendations of Reeves and Wang (2015). Specifically, measurements were conducted three times a week immediately after fertilisation followed by heavy rainfall events and weekly over the remaining period, which was expected to provide a highly accurate estimate (AE10% error) compared with measurements with a sub-daily temporal resolution (Reeves and Wang 2015). Fluxes were measured once on each sampling day during 0900-1100 hours, which has been shown to best approximate the daily mean N 2 O flux (Reeves and Wang 2015).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%