1988
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(88)90142-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum design of reinforced concrete sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last two decades, studies on the design optimization of granular-solid prismatic beams have received considerable attention. Prakash et al (1988); Ezeldin (1991); Quiroga and Arroyo (1991); Erbatur et al (1992); Al-Gahtani et al (1995); ; Lepš and Šejnoha (2003); Barakat et al (2003); Govindaraj and Ramasamy (2005) and Kwak and Noh (2006) attempted to seek optimal shape of beam cross-sections. They highlighted the potential savings in material, either directly or indirectly through various optimization techniques analogous to shape and sizing methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Over the last two decades, studies on the design optimization of granular-solid prismatic beams have received considerable attention. Prakash et al (1988); Ezeldin (1991); Quiroga and Arroyo (1991); Erbatur et al (1992); Al-Gahtani et al (1995); ; Lepš and Šejnoha (2003); Barakat et al (2003); Govindaraj and Ramasamy (2005) and Kwak and Noh (2006) attempted to seek optimal shape of beam cross-sections. They highlighted the potential savings in material, either directly or indirectly through various optimization techniques analogous to shape and sizing methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kirsch [4]presented iterative procedure in three levels of optimization for minimizing the cost of continuous girders with rectangular cross section, in which the total amount of the reinforcement is minimized at the first level, cross-sectional dimension are minimized at the second level, while the third level of optimization iz minimizing the design moments. Lakshmanan and Parameswaran [5]derived a formula for direct determining of optimal span to cross-sectional depth ratio so the iterative trial and error procedure can be avoided, while Prakash et al [6] based their cost-minimization method on Lagrangian and simplex methods. Kanagasundaram and Karihaloo [7,8] introduced thecrushing strength of concrete as an additional variable along with cross-sectional dimensions and steel ratio to optimize the cost of simply supported and multi-span beamswith rectangular and T-sections using sequential linear programming and convex programming.Chakrabarty [9,10] presented cost-optimization method for rectangular beams using the geometric programming andNewton-Rapson method, while Al-salloum and Siddiqi [11]proposed optimal design of singly reinforced rectangular beams by taking the derivatives of the augmented Lagrangian function with respectto the area of steel reinforcement.Coello et al [12] proposed the cost optimal design of singly reinforced rectangularbeam using Genetic Algorithms by considering crosssectional dimensions and the reinforcement area asvariables.…”
Section: Technical Sciences 2013 9(1) 53-60mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En [5] se han aplicado métodos de optimización con criterios múltiples a problemas de diseño de vigas. Asimismo, en [6] propusieron un modelo para optimizar el diseño de secciones de concreto reforzado en el cual consideraron los costos del acero, el concreto y el recubrimiento.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified