2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing upgrade and imperfect preventive maintenance in failure-prone second-hand systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the results of Lemma 1, Equation 17becomes Equation (30). To prove Proposition 3, we redefine K 2 (N) in Inequality (33) as follows:…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using the results of Lemma 1, Equation 17becomes Equation (30). To prove Proposition 3, we redefine K 2 (N) in Inequality (33) as follows:…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the results of Lemma 1, Equation (17) becomes Equation (30), and then, Equation (34) is a finite and unique solution that minimizes Equation (30)…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the same way, seminal research was also conducted on optimizing maintenance or replacement policy for secondhand equipment in recent decade. Therefore, optimal maintenance policies were adjusted for second-hand equipments in [11,12]. In which the authors established maintenance policies which ensure an optimal preventive repair period for secondhand equipment based on the cost and hypotheses on its initial age (deterministic or random).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They develop a mathematical model to determine an optimal warranty policy with respect to maximizing the manufacturer's expected total profit. More recently, Khatab et al consider second‐hand dealers' upgrade operations preceding resale and during PM. They derive a mathematical optimization model to determine the acquisition age, upgrade level, and PM strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%