2008 Joint 6th International IEEE Northeast Workshop on Circuits and Systems and TAISA Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/newcas.2008.4606367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing the number of channels for time interleaved sample-and-hold circuits

Abstract: A technique for optimizing the number of channels for time-interleaved sample-and-hold is proposed. This technique permits to extract the figure of merit of a single sampleand-hold circuit while taking into account the limited gainbandwidth of a family of operational amplifiers sharing the same topology. A double-sampled architecture of sample-and-holds is used to reduce die area and power consumption. The extracted results allow us to determine the optimal operation frequency and consequently the optimal numb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On each clock cycle, one ADC goes from track to hold, capturing a sample of the input signal. The disadvantage of this structure is that the input capacitance of the TI‐ADC becomes very large, which limits the system bandwidth [19]. The second type is S&H with a front‐end sampler.…”
Section: Sandh Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On each clock cycle, one ADC goes from track to hold, capturing a sample of the input signal. The disadvantage of this structure is that the input capacitance of the TI‐ADC becomes very large, which limits the system bandwidth [19]. The second type is S&H with a front‐end sampler.…”
Section: Sandh Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 points spectrum requires a simulation of 2 13 9 N cycles of the complete circuit which requires a very long simulation time. Therefore, for the UMTS/DVBT scenario, the output SNDR was estimated based on the results of electrical simulations of one channel and the results of system level simulations This represents only a 15% die increase and a 10% power consumption increase compared to the interpolation network required for the classical technique.…”
Section: Interpolation Network Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major benefit of all of these approaches is that they increase the conversion bandwidth with a linear increase of the power consumption whereas with a single sigma-delta modulator, the power consumption increases exponentially while drastically increasing the bandwidth [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major benefit of the EFBD architecture is that it allows to increase the conversion bandwidth with a linear increase of the power consumption (the total power consumption is N +2 times the power consumption of one modulator) whereas with a single bandpass sigma-delta modulator, the power consumption increases exponentially while increasing the bandwidth [13].…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%