2014
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra47702a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing the carbon coating on LiFePO4 for improved battery performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the rough surface morphology of the carbon coating for all the samples, especially the one with the thickness in wide range for LMP/C-6, may also be ascribed to the competition between the deposition and the aggregation of polydopamine. The as-obtained polydopamine-derived carbon coating is less uniform than the previously reported one with Fe-containing compounds as the substrate [17][18][19]. This phenomenon may be attributed to the poorer adsorption capability of Mncontaining groups towards the active chemical groups during the formation of polydopamine.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, the rough surface morphology of the carbon coating for all the samples, especially the one with the thickness in wide range for LMP/C-6, may also be ascribed to the competition between the deposition and the aggregation of polydopamine. The as-obtained polydopamine-derived carbon coating is less uniform than the previously reported one with Fe-containing compounds as the substrate [17][18][19]. This phenomenon may be attributed to the poorer adsorption capability of Mncontaining groups towards the active chemical groups during the formation of polydopamine.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…In our experiments, the maximum thickness of relatively uniform carbon coating layer is about 3-5 nm (LMP/C-3), whereas previous works have reported up to 10 nm thick uniform carbon coating along with high carbon content when using higher initial concentration of dopamine monomer and longer polymerization time [17][18]. Nevertheless, owing to the electrochemical inactive nature of carbon, the as-obtained full carbon coating as well as the reduced carbon content in our experiments may be more beneficial to improve the electrochemical properties of LiMnPO4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO 4 ) as a very promising active material attracts much attention for electrical vehicles because of its low toxicity, high safety, potentially low cost, excellent life cycle, high structural stability, and large theoretical capacity (170 mA h g À1 ), among others [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. However, the kinetic performance of LiFePO 4 suffers significantly from poor electronic conductivity and slow lithium-ion transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the kinetic performance of LiFePO 4 suffers significantly from poor electronic conductivity and slow lithium-ion transport. To overcome the disadvantages, the performance was improved by decreasing the particle size, performing a surface modification, doping with other elements, coating with conductive material, and so on [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Nevertheless, to be useful for electric vehicles or high power energy storage, the active material of a Li-ion battery should be coated with a foil type current collector that is much thinner, and its electrode area should be large enough to meet the high power performance with a sufficient capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%