2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.12.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing stretching conditions in fabrication of PTFE hollow fiber membrane for performance improvement in membrane distillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be said that although both compared membranes presented almost similar hydrophobicity, the higher operational stability of the PEI-Zonyl membrane can possibly be attributed to the improved asymmetric structure with smaller pores and improved wetting resistance. It is worth mentioning that the porous PTFE membranes are usually fabricated by thermal and stretching methods (Feng et al 2018;Li et al 2018), which demonstrate symmetric structure with larger pore sizes compared to the asymmetric porous membranes fabricated by non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) method.…”
Section: Agmd Of the Mb Solution And Fouling Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be said that although both compared membranes presented almost similar hydrophobicity, the higher operational stability of the PEI-Zonyl membrane can possibly be attributed to the improved asymmetric structure with smaller pores and improved wetting resistance. It is worth mentioning that the porous PTFE membranes are usually fabricated by thermal and stretching methods (Feng et al 2018;Li et al 2018), which demonstrate symmetric structure with larger pore sizes compared to the asymmetric porous membranes fabricated by non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) method.…”
Section: Agmd Of the Mb Solution And Fouling Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many membrane researchers reported using fluoropolymer membrane due to its hydrophobicity and its excellent processability such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), and PVDF copolymer which are more hydrophobic and present higher solubility including polyvinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene (PVDF-co-HFP), PTFE-co-hexafluoropropylene(FEP) and PVDF-co-trifluorochloroethylene (PVDF-CTFE) in order to prevent membrane wetting. 12,[16][17][18][19] Surface wettability of water contact angle for PVDF-co-HFP was 98.00°, higher compared to PVDF which was 92.19° due to addition of an amorphous phase of hexafluoropropylene (HFP) into the main constituent vinylidene fluoride (VDF) blocks as reported by Balis et al 20 Researchers have proposed several studies to investigate the effect of additive on the properties of PVDF membrane. Zheng et al used inorganic and organic macromolecule additives such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) for the preparation of PVDF-CTFE membrane and observed that the membrane was found to improve hydrophobicity, relatively small pore and exhibited symmetrical cross-section structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Instead, these materials undergo complex stretching and annealing processes in order to induce porosity. Despite this, their low surface energies and high thermal and chemical stabilities make these two materials very attractive for MD applications [107].…”
Section: Electrospinningmentioning
confidence: 99%