2010 2nd International Conference on Computer Technology and Development 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icctd.2010.5645976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Smith-Waterman algorithm on Graphics Processing Unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Toward this end, several researchers have developed parallel versions of the Smith-Waterman algorithm that are suitable for Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Many of these implementations solve a variant of the pairwise sequence alignment problem that asks for the best k , k > 0, alignments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toward this end, several researchers have developed parallel versions of the Smith-Waterman algorithm that are suitable for Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Many of these implementations solve a variant of the pairwise sequence alignment problem that asks for the best k , k > 0, alignments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CS-BLAST [7] a protein sequence search tool is an extension of BLAST, which is based on context-specific mutation probabilities. Several researchers have developed parallel versions of the Smith-Waterman algorithm that are suitable for Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Zheng et.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10,14 These approaches are platform-specific because CUDA is only available for NVidia GPU cards. Another alternative is the use of a framework for heterogeneous platforms like Open Computing Language (OpenCL) 15 to implement this task, 16,17 allowing the execution of the same code in different architectures. However, these OpenCL solutions compare very small query sequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%