2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty component position in the setting of advanced arthritis with posterior glenoid erosion: a computer-enhanced range of motion analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
61
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…). In addition, Keener et al reported increases of 20° (flexion), 68° (extension), 30° (external rotation), and 21° (internal rotation) in average impingement‐free ROM of 10 different bony geometries when decreasing NSA from 155° to 135°. However, the same implant variation caused a decrease of 11° in an average abduction ROM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…). In addition, Keener et al reported increases of 20° (flexion), 68° (extension), 30° (external rotation), and 21° (internal rotation) in average impingement‐free ROM of 10 different bony geometries when decreasing NSA from 155° to 135°. However, the same implant variation caused a decrease of 11° in an average abduction ROM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies related to ROM of rTSA generally characterize ranges of motions that are contained within a subset of single paths (i.e., abduction, flexion, axial rotation, etc.) . However, conclusions pertaining to implant performance drawn from a subset of investigated motions may be misleading, as it has been shown that differing implant designs maximize different motions .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations